Holds contracted rights to state-owned farmland in Heilongjiang province and earns mainly by leasing planting rights and coordination services to independent family farms, rather than from growing and selling crops itself.
- Depends onDownstream position: depends on 10 industries, supplies 6
- ScaleMarket cap is $3.52B, above the global median of $1.18B
- PositionGross margin is 64.3%, higher than 95% of its Farm Products peers (median 17.5%)
- Interpretations4 currently firing — 1 · 3
What this company is and how it runs — written from structure, not news.
The company sits between its contracted rights over state-owned arable land and independent family farms, coordinating infrastructure, technical guidance, disaster response, harvesting support and storage on the farms' behalf, while the farms remain responsible for their own production costs and the resulting profit or loss. A smaller part of its activity is direct sale of agricultural materials, products and services.
Most revenue comes from land-contract fees that family farms pay upfront for the right to farm the company's contracted land, recognized over the length of a planting cycle. A much smaller share comes from direct sales of agricultural materials and products, recognized on delivery and acceptance, and from prepaid agricultural services recognized once completed.
The company carries little debt relative to its cash, pays out much of its profit as dividends rather than reinvesting it, and keeps most operating profit after tax and interest, a combination more consistent with a business that is not deploying large amounts of capital into expansion. Recent capital projects upgrade irrigation, storage and crop-protection infrastructure on land it already holds under contract in its Sanjiang Plain operating region rather than opening new operating areas, so CompanyGraph reads its growth path as intensifying use of an already-contracted land base rather than expanding its footprint.
A large share of what the company buys comes from firms inside its own controlling shareholder's structure, and Beidahuang Agricultural Reclamation Group Co., the controlling shareholder itself, supplies most of its annual purchases, while other named suppliers, including seed companies, an agricultural materials company, and aviation and insurance providers, sit within the same group. Because family farms fund and manage their own production under the land-contract model, the company itself does not directly carry most on-the-ground input costs, and CompanyGraph also maps it as downstream of a wider set of supplying industries.
Family farms that contract its land depend on it for continued access to that land and for the infrastructure, technical guidance, and disaster and harvest support it coordinates on their behalf. It also has buyers of agricultural materials, products and services, but no small group of customers is disclosed as accounting for a large share of sales, and CompanyGraph separately maps it as a supplier into a number of other industries.
Its position rests on holding contracted rights to state-owned arable land as one operating unit inside the Beidahuang Agricultural Reclamation Group, which is also its controlling shareholder and its largest supplier, with the Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs named as the company's ultimate controller. CompanyGraph maps a large number of other companies as running a similarly shaped production system at an industry level, but has no data on how easily a competitor could obtain a comparable state land-contract position, so no claim is made about whether this position can be copied.
Its land contracts with family farms are described as running for a single planting cycle at a time and renewed at the start of each year, rather than locking farms in over a long term. The only disclosed operating requirement is that contracted farms follow its annual technical measures and accept inspection, and the company does not disclose certifications, approvals or other integrations that would create switching costs for its customers.
CompanyGraph's usual reading for this kind of business treats a capped physical processing rate, limited by inputs and available plant, as the main limit on scale, but that reading sits awkwardly here: the company's own named processing assets, the Haolianghe Fertilizer Branch, Longken Malt Co. and a paper subsidiary, have been shut down for a long time and now mainly earn lease income, while most revenue instead comes from land-contract fees. The one growth limit the company names itself is narrower: it says sales of agricultural inputs fell as that market became saturated and prices dropped, and it does not point to a broader capacity, approval, talent or supply constraint on the business as a whole.
The company itself first names two risks: whether long-standing accumulated receivables and inventory can still be realized at recorded value, and exposure to natural disasters such as drought, flood, frost, hail, pests and wind, since land-contracting is closely tied to natural conditions. Nearly all its revenue is concentrated in Heilongjiang province, and most of its purchases flow through its own controlling shareholder, Beidahuang Agricultural Reclamation Group Co., so weather, regional conditions or a disruption in that relationship would reach much of the business at once; its balance sheet, however, shows ample cash relative to debt, so leverage does not appear to be a source of fragility here.
The company names the China Securities Regulatory Commission, the Shanghai Stock Exchange and the Heilongjiang Securities Regulatory Bureau as its governing regulators, without disclosing a specific agricultural, fertilizer or food-production operating license, and it discloses litigation over unpaid sales and processing contracts that remains in enforcement. It also names natural conditions, including drought, flood, frost, hail, pests and wind, as a source of disaster risk to its land-contracting operations, and states that revenue from its agricultural-input sales fell as that market became saturated and commodity prices dropped.
Read from the company's own filings and public materials (gathered August 2026) together with figures CompanyGraph recomputed from its statements. Written September 2026. A question with no evidence behind it is left out rather than answered.
Sign in to view price data.
Sign inWhat the company actually pays, and whether its own cash supports it.
Screen for this company's dividend patterns
Find other companies where the same dividend readings fire.
1 interpretation currently present — each is a set of fired observations whose alignment reads as one structural pattern. Click an observation to see the numbers behind it.
Screen for these patternsHow does this company return capital?
High Dividend Payout With FCF And Equity Ratio
It pays out most of its earnings, on three years of positive free cash flow.
An interpretation is present only while every observation it reads stays fired (score ≥ 70). It describes what the aligned readings show — never a verdict, never a prediction.
The reported statements, read against the company's own industry.
3 interpretations currently present — each is a set of fired observations whose alignment reads as one structural pattern. Click an observation to see the numbers behind it.
Screen for these patternsIs this company financially stable?
MRQ Cash Elevated Relative To Total Debt With EBITDA And FCF Elevated Relative To Total Liabilities
Cash covers most of its debt, with earnings high against its liabilities.
Low-Leverage Liquidity Configuration
Cash on hand covers most or all of its debt, and its equity share of assets is high for its industry.
How does this company use capital?
Minimal Tax and Interest Drag
Almost nothing is lost between its operating profit and its net income.
An interpretation is present only while every observation it reads stays fired (score ≥ 70). It describes what the aligned readings show — never a verdict, never a prediction.
Shared structure with peers — never a ranking.
Structural observations derived from financial data, industry benchmarks, and supply chain position.
Peer Positioning
Financial Health
Supply Chain
Scale
Companies that share the same coordination system — how they create, deliver, or capture value.
Companies that share active interpretations — structural patterns currently present in both stocks.
Supply Chain
Beef Supply Chain
Follow cattle from feed and biological growth through transport, slaughter, carcass balance, processing, cold storage, cooking, and recovery. One animal becomes many outputs while grinding merges many identities, so time, traceability, welfare, and money determine usable food.
Biomass and Biofuel Supply Chain
Biomass is material with a prior function and an alternative fate. Follow residues, crops, wood, oils, and wet streams through storage, conversion, use, credits, and return, asking what each route preserves, consumes, and displaces.
Cocoa Supply Chain
Follow cacao from tree and pod through harvest, fermentation, drying, aggregation, factory separation, chocolate manufacture, use, and residuals. The bean is not the constant object: each stage creates a new condition and closes earlier options.
Coffee Supply Chain
Coffee can reach the cup even when much of its history has disappeared. Follow the chain to see what gets damaged, what money makes possible, what records can prove, and where responsibility breaks.
Seafood Supply Chain
Follow wild or farmed seafood through harvest, chilling, processing, sale, consumption, and residuals. Biological renewal before harvest and irreversible quality loss after it make quotas, ice, payment, identity, and feedback part of the food supply.
Sugar Supply Chain
Follow sucrose from a living cane stalk or beet root into a uniform crystal, then through food, fermentation, and residues—and see what concentration makes possible and what it disconnects.