CompanyGraph
Franchises Tim Hortons, Burger King, Popeyes, and Firehouse Subs locations worldwide, collecting a cut of every sale franchisees make.
- Returns appear driven by leverage
- Most companies in its industry are production businesses; this one is an interface business
- Depends onDownstream position: depends on 11 industries, supplies 5
- ScaleMarket cap is higher than 95% of all stocks globally
- FinancialsAltman Z-Score: grey zone
- Interpretations4 currently firing — 1 · 3
What this company is and how it runs — written from structure, not news.
- Most companies in its industry are production businesses; this one is an interface business
Restaurant Brands International franchises four fast-food brands — Tim Hortons, Burger King, Popeyes, and Firehouse Subs — across more than 32,000 locations worldwide, collecting royalties as a percentage of whatever sales its franchisees ring up. The majority of those royalties flow from Tim Hortons' 4,000-plus Canadian stores, which also feed a second revenue stream: franchisees are required by contract to buy their coffee beans, baked goods ingredients, and branded packaging through Restaurant Brands' own supply chain, and at that volume the company negotiates procurement costs no new competitor could match. But Canada is now effectively full — the commercial real estate that could support another Tim Hortons location has largely been absorbed — so the royalty stream can only grow if existing Canadian customers visit more often or spend more each trip, not if new stores open. That means a sustained dip in Canadian consumer traffic hits the whole enterprise hard, because international franchise deals in newer markets generate fees at a fraction of the rate that a mature Canadian Tim Hortons does, and they cannot make up the difference quickly.
How does this company make money?
The company collects a fee each time a new franchise location opens. After that, it collects a royalty on every sale that franchisee makes — a percentage that flows in continuously as long as the location is open. It also charges franchisees for advertising fund contributions. On top of those, it earns a markup on the coffee beans, baked goods ingredients, and branded packaging that Canadian Tim Hortons operators are required to buy through the company's own supply chain.
What makes this company hard to replace?
Franchisees — the people actually running the stores — are bound by multi-year franchise agreements with renewal options that lock in their fee structures for the length of the contract. They are also required to buy ingredients and packaging through the company's supply chain, which embeds them in a system that is difficult and costly to exit mid-contract. Territorial rights granted in those agreements also prevent a franchisee from simply switching to a competing franchise brand within their protected geographic area.
What limits this company?
Canada produces the majority of the company's royalty income, but there are almost no good locations left to open a new Tim Hortons there. The commercial real estate that could support another location has largely been taken. So the company cannot grow Canadian revenue by opening more stores — it can only grow if the people already walking into existing stores come more often or spend more each visit.
What does this company depend on?
The company cannot operate without Canadian commercial real estate to place Tim Hortons locations, franchisee capital to fund new store construction, supply chain contracts that deliver Tim Hortons coffee beans and baked goods ingredients, master franchise partners who hold territorial rights in international markets, and advertising fund contributions paid by franchisees that fund brand marketing.
Who depends on this company?
Tim Hortons franchisees in Canada rely on the brand's recognition to bring customers through the door — without it, their locations would have no obvious reason to attract traffic. Master franchisees in international markets hold territorial rights that become worthless if the company withdraws brand support. Vendors who manufacture branded packaging and ingredients exclusively for these systems would lose their entire reason to exist if the company stopped ordering.
How does this company scale?
Standardized training programs and supply protocols mean the company can add new franchise locations without hiring many more corporate staff — the playbook is already written and replicated cheaply. But expanding into a new country requires adjusting menus for local tastes, navigating local regulations, and finding and managing local master franchise partners, none of which can be automated or done quickly.
What external forces can significantly affect this company?
When the Canadian dollar weakens, the economics of international expansion become harder to justify and supply chain costs shift in ways the company cannot fully control. Immigration policies in countries where the company wants to grow can restrict the labor that franchise operators depend on to staff their locations. Trade regulations can complicate moving ingredients and packaging across borders to international franchise locations.
Where is this company structurally vulnerable?
If Canadian federal or provincial governments passed a law banning mandatory purchasing requirements in franchise agreements, Tim Hortons operators would be free to buy their ingredients wherever they wanted. That would eliminate the supply-chain markup revenue the company collects today and also remove the cost advantage that keeps franchisees tied to the system — hitting the company's income from two directions at once.
Price is read as structure — trend, levels, range, peak and volatility drawn on the chart. It does not predict where price goes next.
Sign in to view price data.
Sign in1 interpretation currently present — each is a set of fired observations whose alignment reads as one structural pattern. Click an observation to see the numbers behind it.
Screen for these patternsHow is this stock behaving?
Multi-Year Up-Close-Week Share With Profitability And Book-Value Growth
Three observations describe the present configuration: a high share of the trailing three years' weekly closes were higher than the prior week, the company has reported positive net income in each of the last five annual periods, and the book-value-increase-consistency composite over the trailing 5 years is elevated.
An interpretation is present only while every observation it reads stays fired (score ≥ 70). It describes what the aligned readings show — never a verdict, never a prediction.
What the company actually pays, and whether its own cash supports it.
The reported statements, read against the company's own industry.
- Returns appear driven by leverage
3 interpretations currently present — each is a set of fired observations whose alignment reads as one structural pattern. Click an observation to see the numbers behind it.
Screen for these patternsIs this company financially stable?
Intangible Concentration
Three balance sheet composition observations have converged at elevated readings: intangible assets are a large share of total assets, goodwill is a large share of total assets, and goodwill is large relative to shareholders equity. Together they describe an asset and equity base heavily composed of non-physical, acquisition-derived line items.
How does this company use capital?
Rising Operating Income With Low Depreciation on a Capital-Heavy Balance Sheet
Three observations describe a low-D&A profile alongside rising operating income: operating income has increased year-over-year across the trailing four years, EBIT is close to EBITDA in the most recent period (small D&A), and non-current assets are a large share of total assets. The composition is consistent with under-depreciation or a young asset base whose depreciation has not yet caught up.
Is this company growing?
Multi-Year Revenue, Profit, And Income Growth
Three multi-year observations co-occur: revenue increased year-over-year in each of the last three fiscal years, gross profit (absolute level) increased year-over-year in each of the last four fiscal years, and net income was positive in each of the last five fiscal years. The configuration describes growth-and-profitability persistence across three different windows.
An interpretation is present only while every observation it reads stays fired (score ≥ 70). It describes what the aligned readings show — never a verdict, never a prediction.
Shared structure with peers — never a ranking.
Structural observations derived from financial data, industry benchmarks, and supply chain position.
Structural Tensions
Financial Health
Supply Chain
Scale
Companies that share the same coordination system — how they create, deliver, or capture value.
Companies that share active interpretations — structural patterns currently present in both stocks.
Supply Chain
Beef Supply Chain
Follow cattle from feed and biological growth through transport, slaughter, carcass balance, processing, cold storage, cooking, and recovery. One animal becomes many outputs while grinding merges many identities, so time, traceability, welfare, and money determine usable food.
Coffee Supply Chain
Coffee can reach the cup even when much of its history has disappeared. Follow the chain to see what gets damaged, what money makes possible, what records can prove, and where responsibility breaks.
Seafood Supply Chain
Follow wild or farmed seafood through harvest, chilling, processing, sale, consumption, and residuals. Biological renewal before harvest and irreversible quality loss after it make quotas, ice, payment, identity, and feedback part of the food supply.