Operates 41 giant crude oil tankers and 22 slightly smaller ones built specifically to move oil from Middle East terminals to Asian refineries.
At a glance
Depends onUpstream position: supplies 3 industries, depends on 0
ScaleMarket cap is above the global median
PositionOperating margin is in the top 5% of Oil & Gas Midstream peers
Interpretations3 currently firing — 1 · 2
What this company is and how it runs — written from structure, not news.
Nature view
Frontline plc operates 41 VLCCs and 22 Suezmax tankers built to fit the deepwater berths at Middle East export terminals like Ras Tanura and the import jetties at Asian refineries — the same hull dimensions that allow a vessel to load a full cargo at one end are what determine which discharge terminals it can reach at the other. Because oil majors like Exxon Mobil attach vetting approvals to individual hulls based on their documented performance history at those specific terminals, a competitor cannot simply redirect its own ships into those berths — the approvals take years to accumulate and cannot be bought or transferred. That accumulated history is also what keeps Frontline's vessels near the front of the loading queue, so a newcomer arriving with identical hardware still waits behind hulls that have already proved themselves at the terminal. The same physical fit that creates all of this, however, becomes a liability if the corridor itself closes — a sanctions designation on a major Middle East crude origin or a sustained Suez Canal closure would leave 41 ships with the wrong hull geometry for any alternative employment that makes economic sense.
How does this company make money?
When a vessel is on a time charter, the customer pays a fixed daily rate for however long the contract runs, regardless of how many voyages the ship completes. On the spot market, the company earns a rate calculated per ton of crude carried on a single voyage, and those rates move up and down based on how many ships are available versus how much cargo needs to move on a given route at a given time.
What makes this company hard to replace?
Long-term charter party contracts tie oil majors to specific vessels with defined performance guarantees and delivery schedules, making it costly to walk away mid-contract. Each vessel also carries hull-specific vetting approvals from oil companies that required extensive safety and technical documentation to obtain — switching to an unvetted ship means going through that process again. On top of that, terminals prioritize vessels with a track record at their berths, so a ship without that history goes to the back of the queue.
What limits this company?
The ceiling is the number of deepwater berths at Middle East export terminals. Each berth can load only one VLCC at a time, so when berths are backed up or a terminal goes offline, every one of the company's 41 VLCCs is affected at once. Because all of them are built for the same berth class, there is no smaller vessel to fill in — the whole sub-fleet slows down together.
What does this company depend on?
The company cannot operate without IMO-certified marine crews who hold tanker endorsements, Lloyd's Register and other classification societies that certify each hull as seaworthy, the crude oil loading terminals at Ras Tanura and other Middle East export facilities, marine gas oil bunker fuel available at major ports along the route, and P&I Club maritime insurance that covers the vessels.
Who depends on this company?
Exxon Mobil and other oil majors plan their refinery crude supply around reliable VLCC deliveries from Middle East producers — disruption would throw those supply schedules off. Independent refiners across Asia rely on consistent Suezmax tanker service for their feedstock; without it they face shortages and have to slow or stop production. Crude oil traders who take positions on price differences between markets depend on having the right vessel class available to physically move the cargo that closes those trades.
How does this company scale?
Adding more VLCCs or Suezmax vessels is relatively straightforward in terms of operations — crews are trained to the same standards and port relationships carry over to each new hull. What does not scale quickly is the shipyard itself: no matter how much capital is available, new vessels take 24 to 36 months to deliver, and the vetting records and berthing slot history that make a hull commercially effective take additional time on top of that to accumulate.
What external forces can significantly affect this company?
U.S. and EU sanctions can immediately ban the transport of crude from a specific country, wiping out a trade route overnight. The Suez Canal Authority sets transit fees and can close the canal entirely, forcing ships onto the much longer Cape of Good Hope route and cutting into voyage economics. China's decisions about filling its strategic petroleum reserve create swings in demand for tankers that have nothing to do with how much crude its refineries actually need at that moment.
Where is this company structurally vulnerable?
If the U.S. or EU placed sanctions on a major Middle East crude origin, or if the Suez Canal closed for an extended period, the fleet would have nowhere useful to go. The ships are physically built for one corridor. Their vetting records and berthing history would still exist, but they would be worthless if the crude at one end cannot legally move or the route to Asia becomes too expensive to use.
Price is read as structure — trend, levels, range, peak and volatility drawn on the chart. It does not predict where price goes next.
1 interpretation currently present — each is a set of fired observations whose alignment reads as one structural pattern. Click an observation to see the numbers behind it.
Pivot Lows Consecutively Higher With Sustained Directional-Movement Asymmetry And OBV Trending Up
Three observations have aligned in the up direction: the higher-lows-pattern observation is firing, the ADX observation (sustained directional-movement asymmetry) is in the upper portion of its mapped range, and the OBV-trending-up observation is firing.
Reads
An interpretation is present only while every observation it reads stays fired (score ≥ 70). It describes what the aligned readings show — never a verdict, never a prediction.
What the company actually pays, and whether its own cash supports it.
Dividends view
Yield
16.99%Above 5Y avg (11.48%)
Annual Rate
USD 6.20Paid quarterly
Payout Ratio
43.4%Sustainable
Paying Dividends
30 yr
Payback Period
13.3 yr
Last Ex-Dividend
Jun 12, 2026
Last Payment
Jun 23, 2026
The reported statements, read against the company's own industry.
Financials view
Market Capitalization
8.12BUSD
vs all stocks (USD)
Updated Jul 18, 2026
Trailing P/E
9.16x
vs Oil & Gas Midstream peers
Updated Jul 18, 2026
Revenue (TTM)
2.25BUSD
vs all stocks (USD)
Updated Jul 18, 2026
Profit Margin
40.19%
vs Oil & Gas Midstream peers
Updated Jul 18, 2026
Beta
0.0270x
vs all stocks
Updated Jul 18, 2026
52-Week Change
101.71%
vs all stocks
Updated Jul 18, 2026
Forward Annual Dividend Yield
16.99%
vs all stocks
Updated Jul 18, 2026
Market Capitalization
8.12BUSD
vs all stocks (USD)
Updated Jul 18, 2026
Enterprise Value
10.43BUSD
vs all stocks (USD)
Updated Jul 18, 2026
Trailing P/E
9.16x
vs Oil & Gas Midstream peers
Updated Jul 18, 2026
Gross Margin
55.44%
vs Oil & Gas Midstream peers
Updated Jul 18, 2026
Profit Margin
40.19%
vs Oil & Gas Midstream peers
Updated Jul 18, 2026
Operating Margin
51.81%
vs Oil & Gas Midstream peers
Updated Jul 18, 2026
Shares Outstanding
222.62MSharesUpdated Jul 18, 2026
Float Shares
142.92MSharesUpdated Jul 18, 2026
Shares Short
5.52MSharesUpdated Jul 18, 2026
Short Ratio
1.52days
vs all stocks
Updated Jul 18, 2026
Short % of Shares Outstanding
52-Week Low
18.06USDUpdated Jul 18, 2026
52-Week High
43.10USDUpdated Jul 18, 2026
52-Week Change
101.71%
vs all stocks
Updated Jul 18, 2026
Beta
0.0270x
vs all stocks
Updated Jul 18, 2026
2 interpretations currently present — each is a set of fired observations whose alignment reads as one structural pattern. Click an observation to see the numbers behind it.
Three financing observations align: debt issuance is large relative to operating cash flow, absolute financing cash flow is large relative to operating cash flow, and long-term debt is a large share of total debt. Together they describe heavy financing activity with a long-term-debt-dominant mix.
Reads
Long-Term Debt A High Share Of Total Liabilities, Short-Term Debt A High Share Of Current Liabilities
Two balance-sheet composition observations have aligned: long-term debt is a high share of total liabilities (denominator is all liabilities, not just interest-bearing debt), and short-term debt is a high share of current liabilities.
Reads
An interpretation is present only while every observation it reads stays fired (score ≥ 70). It describes what the aligned readings show — never a verdict, never a prediction.
Shared structure with peers — never a ranking.
Relationships view
Structural observations derived from financial data, industry benchmarks, and supply chain position.
Peer Positioning
Operating margin is in the top 5% of Oil & Gas Midstream peersSignificant
Operating margin: 0.52Industry P95: 0.51
Financial Health
Altman Z-Score: grey zoneSignificant
Altman Z-Score: 2.41
High earnings qualityNotable
Earnings Quality Score: 0.71
High structural barrier to entryNotable
Barrier to Entry: 1.21
Supply Chain
Upstream position: supplies 3 industries, depends on 0Notable
Outgoing: 3.00Incoming: 0.00
Scale
Market cap is above the global medianNotable
Market cap (USD): 8,123,509,256Global Median: 1,131,844,382.907
Long-Term Debt A High Share Of Total Liabilities, Short-Term Debt A High Share Of Current LiabilitiesPivot Lows Consecutively Higher With Sustained Directional-Movement Asymmetry And OBV Trending UpDebt Financing Activity
Long-Term Debt A High Share Of Total Liabilities, Short-Term Debt A High Share Of Current LiabilitiesPivot Lows Consecutively Higher With Sustained Directional-Movement Asymmetry And OBV Trending UpDebt Financing Activity