AddTech AB
ADDT.B · Nasdaq Stockholm · Sweden
Price data from its 0QI7 listing on LSE
addtech.comFinancials as of FY2026
Addtech buys technical products and components from outside manufacturers, adapts them using in-house engineering know-how, and resells them to manufacturing and infrastructure customers through a decentralized group of independently run trading businesses.
- Depends onMidstream position: 6 outgoing, 5 incoming connections
- ScaleMarket cap is $9.26B, above the global median of $1.18B
- PositionPrice-to-book is 10.69×, higher than 95% of its Industrial Distribution peers (median 2.46×)
- Interpretations4 currently firing — 4
What this company is and how it runs — written from structure, not news.
The system sits between outside component manufacturers and industrial or infrastructure buyers, coordinating product selection, technical advice, adaptation and solution development so that suppliers' products meet each buyer's specific requirements, rather than manufacturing most of what it sells itself. Its own account describes this matching and adaptation work as carried out locally and repeatedly by many separately run businesses rather than centralized in one place. This positions the group in the middle of its supply chain, with connections running both to suppliers upstream and to customers downstream.
Addtech earns revenue mainly by invoicing customers for physical products at a fixed price agreed at the time of order, collected on ordinary short commercial terms, rather than through subscriptions, usage fees or long-term contracts. A smaller portion comes from service assignments, and revenue is recognized mostly when delivery happens rather than spread over the life of a project. Measured against industry peers, the margin earned on this activity has consistently sat toward the higher end of the range.
Addtech's own account shows it expanding mainly by acquiring additional independently run trading companies rather than by growing the volume of any single existing unit, adding new businesses to the group on a continuing basis. CompanyGraph reads this as a structural pattern in which scale comes from the number of semi-autonomous businesses gathered under the group rather than from any one of them growing large on its own. This pace of acquisition-led growth coexists with free cash flow that sits elevated relative to the group's total assets and equity, and with sustained multi-year growth in revenue, profit and book value, though the evidence does not establish exactly how any single acquisition is financed. The acquisition-led scaling mechanism itself is CompanyGraph's interpretation of the disclosed pattern of activity, not a description the company uses in these terms.
Its own account names several things the business leans on to keep functioning: outside suppliers meeting the volume, quality and delivery commitments made to customers, continued customer demand and investment appetite, the ability to retain and recruit skilled employees, and information systems, including third-party cyber security, continuing to function correctly.
Its own account describes a broad, unconcentrated customer base: no single customer accounts for a large share of consolidated sales, and its buyers are chiefly other manufacturing and infrastructure companies, reached as original equipment makers, end customers and retailers. No customer or small group of customers is described as holding outsized leverage over the business.
Addtech's structural shape, buying components and converting them into customer-ready solutions for resale, is not a rare one: CompanyGraph identifies a sizable number of other companies elsewhere built around this same kind of flow. Within that group, Addtech's returns on capital and its margins have persistently sat at the upper end of the peer range across recent years, rather than appearing only once.
Addtech's own account describes customer relationships as running on short, renewable cycles rather than long-term commitments: even under framework agreements, a contract is generally considered to arise only when a customer places a specific order, with a brief interval between order and delivery. Its account does not describe an additional mechanism, such as technical integration, exclusive sourcing rights or a disclosed retention or backlog figure, that would make switching away costly for a customer.
The industrial-distribution businesses CompanyGraph groups Addtech with are typically limited by how much physical volume their plant or equipment can convert in a given period. Addtech's own account does not describe that kind of limit; instead it states that continued success depends on retaining experienced employees and recruiting skilled people, and it separately names difficulty finding suitable companies to acquire as a constraint on growth. Consistent with this, its own account describes in-house production as limited, so what it reports as limiting it looks more like people and available acquisition targets than physical conversion capacity. In its energy-related infrastructure work specifically, it also names external approval processes and grid capacity constraints set by grid owners, rather than by Addtech itself, as a factor slowing project rollout.
The company's own account names dependence on external suppliers meeting volume, quality and delivery commitments, on customers' demand and investment appetite holding up, on retaining and recruiting skilled employees, and on information systems, including third-party cyber security, continuing to function, as the dependencies it weighs when assessing risk. It also states, in its own account, that it is not reliant on any single supplier or customer over the longer term, which tempers concentration in any one relationship as a specific point of failure.
The company's own risk disclosures name general economic and geopolitical conditions, together with structural change in its markets and competitive pressure, as the outside forces it weighs first. It also flags exposure to movements across many foreign currencies arising from its international operations, and within its energy-related infrastructure work it specifically names regulatory approval processes, appeals and grid capacity constraints as factors that can slow project rollout.
Read from the company's own filings and public materials (gathered August 2026) together with figures CompanyGraph recomputed from its statements. Written September 2026. A question with no evidence behind it is left out rather than answered.
Sign in to view price data.
Sign inWhat the company actually pays, and whether its own cash supports it.
The reported statements, read against the company's own industry.
4 interpretations currently present — each is a set of fired observations whose alignment reads as one structural pattern. Click an observation to see the numbers behind it.
Screen for these patternsHow does this company use capital?
FCF Ratios Elevated
Its free cash flow is large next to assets and equity, and more of its operating cash reaches it than in its industry.
Industry-Benchmarked ROA and Margin Elevated
Returns and margins have sat in the top of its industry across five years.
ROE, ROA, And Operating ROA Elevated
It earns more on its equity than its industry does, and on its assets too — not on borrowing alone.
Is this company growing?
Multi-Year Revenue, Profit, And Income Growth
Revenue has risen in each of three years, gross profit in each of four, and it has made a profit in all five.
An interpretation is present only while every observation it reads stays fired (score ≥ 70). It describes what the aligned readings show — never a verdict, never a prediction.
Shared structure with peers — never a ranking.
Structural observations derived from financial data, industry benchmarks, and supply chain position.
Peer Positioning
Financial Health
Supply Chain
Scale
Companies that share the same coordination system — how they create, deliver, or capture value.
Companies that share active interpretations — structural patterns currently present in both stocks.