CompanyGraph
Prada S.p.A.
1913 · HKEX · Italy
Price data from its 1913N listing on BMV, quoted in MXN
pradagroup.comFinancials as of FY2025
A luxury fashion company that designs and manufactures its own goods and sells them through its own stores, where earnings depend on sustaining brand desirability rather than on any single product line.
- Depends onMidstream position: 6 outgoing, 5 incoming connections
- ScaleMarket cap is $15.03B, above the global median of $1.18B
- FinancialsAltman Z-Score 2.35: grey zone
- Interpretations4 currently firing — 4
What this company is and how it runs — written from structure, not news.
The system coordinates the physical production of goods, the ongoing maintenance of consumer attention toward the brand, and the movement of finished goods into its own points of sale. CompanyGraph's map places it in a middle position within its wider network of industry connections, with links both feeding into it and flowing out from it.
Revenue, gross profit, and net income have moved together, each growing or staying positive across every recent year on file, and the business has converted a high share of that revenue into operating cash while spending less of it on capital investment than most of its peers. Free cash flow has stayed positive through this growth, and receivables have grown alongside revenue over the same stretch, a pairing CompanyGraph observes without a stated cause in the data it holds.
CompanyGraph classifies several hundred other companies as running this same kind of system, one where growth is expected to come from compounding brand equity into pricing power and repeat purchase rather than from expanding volume alone. This company's recent cash conversion sits toward the high end of its own history and above much of its peer group, with capital spending taking a smaller share of operating cash than most peers, a pattern consistent with, though not proof of, scale coming through margin retained per sale rather than through heavy reinvestment.
CompanyGraph's map of industry connections records a number of links feeding into this company from elsewhere in the system, consistent with the middle position CompanyGraph assigns it. Which specific industries or suppliers those links represent is not identified in what CompanyGraph currently holds.
The same map records a number of links running outward from this company to elsewhere in the system, consistent with the same middle position. Which specific customers or industries those links reach is not identified in what CompanyGraph currently holds.
CompanyGraph classifies several hundred other companies as running this same kind of system, so the underlying shape, production organized around compounding brand equity, is common rather than rare among the companies CompanyGraph tracks. What specifically would stop a competitor from copying this particular company's version of that shape is not something CompanyGraph can measure from what it currently holds.
CompanyGraph's starting assumption for this industry is that scale is bound by the need to keep sustaining brand equity and relevance, since value here depends on continued consumer desire for the brand rather than on a depleting resource, a regulatory gate, or fixed physical capacity. This is a general assumption CompanyGraph applies at the industry level, not a limit it has measured directly from this company's own figures.
CompanyGraph treats the ongoing need to sustain consumer attention and brand desirability as the main outside pressure on this kind of business, since pricing power rests on that perception rather than on a fixed physical asset or a regulatory license. This is a general reading CompanyGraph applies to businesses with this kind of economics, not a pressure it has confirmed specifically for this company.
Read from figures CompanyGraph recomputed from this company's statements and from its structural position. Written August 2026. A question with no evidence behind it is left out rather than answered.
Sign in to view price data.
Sign inWhat the company actually pays, and whether its own cash supports it.
The reported statements, read against the company's own industry.
4 interpretations currently present — each is a set of fired observations whose alignment reads as one structural pattern. Click an observation to see the numbers behind it.
Screen for these patternsHow does this company use capital?
Cash-Flow Ratios Elevated
More of its sales turn into cash than in its industry, and less of that cash is consumed by reinvestment than at most of its peers.
Multi-Year FCF With Growth And Margin
Three years of positive free cash flow and rising revenue, four of rising equity, and much of its sales turns into cash.
Revenue Growing With Receivables Growing
Revenue has risen three years, and what customers owe has risen with it.
Is this company growing?
Multi-Year Revenue, Profit, And Income Growth
Revenue has risen in each of three years, gross profit in each of four, and it has made a profit in all five.
An interpretation is present only while every observation it reads stays fired (score ≥ 70). It describes what the aligned readings show — never a verdict, never a prediction.
Shared structure with peers — never a ranking.
Structural observations derived from financial data, industry benchmarks, and supply chain position.
Financial Health
Supply Chain
Scale
Companies that share the same coordination system — how they create, deliver, or capture value.
Companies that share active interpretations — structural patterns currently present in both stocks.