Designs and certifies analog chips for Chinese electric vehicles and driver-assistance systems using factories that US export controls cannot reach.
What stands out
- Earnings significantly exceed cash generation
At a glance
Designs and certifies analog chips for Chinese electric vehicles and driver-assistance systems using factories that US export controls cannot reach.
3Peak designs analog chips — the kind that manage battery power and convert sensor signals — and puts each one through an 18-to-24-month AEC-Q100 qualification process that proves the part can survive automotive temperatures and reliability demands on mature chip-making processes available to Chinese foundries like SMIC. Once a chip passes that cycle, the tier-one supplier building the vehicle's circuit board routes the copper traces around that exact pin layout, so replacing 3Peak's part later would mean redesigning the board and restarting the full qualification clock — a delay no vehicle program will accept mid-production. Because the qualification certificates are tied to processes that US export controls have not yet targeted, 3Peak sits in a protected lane that a new entrant cannot shortcut: the only way to compete is to run the same years-long test cycles from scratch. The company's single point of fragility is its small team of mixed-signal engineers, since the analog design skill required to hit automotive noise and power targets on mature nodes takes years to develop and cannot be hired quickly — and if US controls were extended to cover Synopsys and Cadence design software, those engineers would lose the tools needed to tape out new designs, leaving the existing qualification portfolio to age out as vehicle platforms turn over.
How does this company make money?
The company earns money on each chip unit it sells, priced according to how precise, power-efficient, and temperature-tolerant the chip is — tighter specifications command higher prices. It also charges one-time engineering fees when a customer needs a custom chip designed specifically for their automotive or industrial application.
What makes this company hard to replace?
Switching suppliers means re-running an 18-to-24-month AEC-Q100 certification cycle, which automotive OEM program schedules simply will not absorb once a platform is in production. Beyond the time cost, the customer's circuit board is physically laid out around this company's chip pin assignments, so changing suppliers also requires a full board redesign. Long-term supply agreements with Chinese automotive OEMs also include inventory buffering commitments that make a mid-contract supplier change financially and logistically painful.
What limits this company?
The company can only grow as fast as it can hire mixed-signal engineers — the specialists who design analog circuits that stay quiet, efficient, and stable across extreme temperatures. That skill takes years to develop, no software tool can automate it the way digital chip design can be automated, and there are not many people in China who have it.
What does this company depend on?
The company cannot run without wafer fabrication from SMIC and TSMC on mature process nodes, analog circuit simulation software from Synopsys and Cadence, chip packaging and testing from assembly houses like ASE Group and Amkor, and active reference design relationships with Chinese tier-one automotive suppliers.
Who depends on this company?
Chinese automotive electronics makers building battery management and ADAS systems would lose their locally sourced analog components and have no qualified domestic replacement. Telecommunications infrastructure vendors in China would face disruption to their signal conditioning supply. Industrial automation equipment makers in China would lose access to cost-competitive precision data converters rated for factory temperature ranges.
How does this company scale?
Once an analog circuit design is finished, the company can spin it into product variants for automotive, telecom, and industrial customers without starting from zero — the core amplifier or converter architecture carries over. What does not scale easily is the engineering team behind those designs. Hiring more mixed-signal specialists takes years of training per person, and the work cannot be handed off to outside contractors or automated.
What external forces can significantly affect this company?
US export controls already restrict Chinese companies' access to advanced chip-making processes and could be extended to cover Synopsys and Cadence EDA software, which would cut off the design tools the company relies on. Chinese government policy pushes chipmakers toward domestic foundries, which sometimes run less capable analog processes than the company would otherwise choose. On the demand side, China's rapid shift to electric vehicles is driving more orders for battery management and power conversion chips than the company's current design capacity can easily fill.
Where is this company structurally vulnerable?
If the US extended export controls to cover Synopsys and Cadence software licenses for Chinese companies, the company could no longer simulate or verify new analog chip designs well enough to meet automotive performance targets. Without new tape-outs, no new chips enter the certification pipeline. As car platforms refresh every few years, the existing certified chips age out of use, and the entire library of switching-cost lock-in disappears with nothing to replace it.
Sign in to view price data.
Sign inScreen for dividend patterns
Find other stocks with similar dividend characteristics in the screener.
Structural observations derived from financial data, industry benchmarks, and supply chain position.
Companies that share the same coordination system — how they create, deliver, or capture value.
Companies that share active interpretations — structural patterns currently present in both stocks.
CompanyGraph