CompanyGraph
Supplies farming inputs, mainly feed, to independent farmers as one-time product sales, and in part of its business also buys back the livestock those farmers raise for resale.
- Depends onMidstream position: 6 outgoing, 8 incoming connections
- ScaleRevenue is $19.55B, higher than 95% of all stocks globally
- FinancialsAltman Z-Score 5.74: safe zone
- Interpretations3 currently firing — 3
What this company is and how it runs — written from structure, not news.
It sits between bulk grain and soymeal markets and independent farmers, converting purchased commodities into feed and other farming inputs that move out through distributors and direct technical-service teams. In part of its business it also coordinates the reverse flow, buying back the animals farmers raise with its inputs and reselling them.
The large majority of revenue comes from feed, sold as a one-time product rather than through subscriptions or long-term contracts. Smaller portions come from live animals and other agricultural products, animal-health products, and trading activity, with each sale recognized once goods are delivered or picked up and accepted.
It scales by placing production close to demand across a large number of factories spread across many regions and countries, rather than concentrating output in a few large plants, combined with a business that ties up relatively little in fixed assets and cycles inventory, receivables and payables quickly. That pattern reads more like scaling through geographic replication and fast working-capital turnover than through the consumer brand-building mechanism its industry grouping would suggest, though this is CompanyGraph's interpretation of the pattern rather than a direct measurement of how growth happens.
Its physical inputs are bulk agricultural commodities, above all corn and soybean or soybean meal, bought through a mix of centralized bulk procurement and local sourcing that the company describes as global. That sourcing pattern exposes it to international shipping capacity, logistics costs and currency movements, though its filings do not name which specific suppliers it relies on most heavily.
A large and dispersed base of independent farmers, ranging from small family operations to large-scale and professional farming groups, depends on it for feed, seedlings, vaccines and the technical requirements attached to them, alongside distributors that resell its products and food enterprises that buy from it. In its swine business that dependency runs in both directions: the same farmers who buy its inputs also sell their finished animals back to it.
A substantial number of other companies run production economics of the same kind, so on the evidence available this is a common structural shape rather than a rare one. The company's own materials point to research-driven feed formulation, pairing feed with matched seedlings and health products, and direct technical service to farmers as what it considers distinctive, but nothing on file measures whether rivals can reproduce that combination.
CompanyGraph's industry classification carries a starting assumption that growth is bound by sustaining consumer brand equity, but the company's own filings point elsewhere. Raw materials make up almost all of its feed-production costs, and the risks it lists first are commodity price swings together with the environmental policy and farming conditions that set how much downstream demand exists, which reads as a scale limit set by input-cost spreads and farm-level demand rather than by brand relevance.
Its own filings name animal disease and abnormal weather as first among its risks, because both can suppress the downstream farming activity that creates demand for its feed and other inputs, and they name swings in raw-material prices as a related exposure because materials make up almost all of its production cost. They also name environmental-policy changes affecting farming capacity and currency movements tied to overseas operations, without identifying a specific event, customer or region as the source of a potential failure.
Its own filings name weather and animal-disease conditions, swings in raw-material prices, environmental-policy changes that affect where and how much farming capacity can operate, and currency movements as the pressures it lists first among its risks. It also names shifts in trade policy, international relations, shipping capacity and logistics costs as forces that reach it indirectly through the commodity prices and costs those shifts move, without pointing to a specific tariff or sanctions regime.
Read from the company's own filings and public materials (gathered August 2026) together with figures CompanyGraph recomputed from its statements. Written August 2026. A question with no evidence behind it is left out rather than answered.
Sign in to view price data.
Sign inWhat the company actually pays, and whether its own cash supports it.
The reported statements, read against the company's own industry.
3 interpretations currently present — each is a set of fired observations whose alignment reads as one structural pattern. Click an observation to see the numbers behind it.
Screen for these patternsHow does this company use capital?
Working Capital Pattern
What customers owe has grown three years running, while it clears stock quickly and pays suppliers quickly.
Low Fixed-Asset Share With Elevated Turnover
It owns few buildings and machines, yet gets more sales and profit from its assets than its industry does.
Three Turnover Ratios Elevated
Collects fast, clears inventory fast, and pays suppliers fast too.
An interpretation is present only while every observation it reads stays fired (score ≥ 70). It describes what the aligned readings show — never a verdict, never a prediction.
Shared structure with peers — never a ranking.
Structural observations derived from financial data, industry benchmarks, and supply chain position.
Financial Health
Supply Chain
Scale
Companies that share the same coordination system — how they create, deliver, or capture value.
Companies that share active interpretations — structural patterns currently present in both stocks.
Supply Chain
Beef Supply Chain
Follow cattle from feed and biological growth through transport, slaughter, carcass balance, processing, cold storage, cooking, and recovery. One animal becomes many outputs while grinding merges many identities, so time, traceability, welfare, and money determine usable food.
Cocoa Supply Chain
Follow cacao from tree and pod through harvest, fermentation, drying, aggregation, factory separation, chocolate manufacture, use, and residuals. The bean is not the constant object: each stage creates a new condition and closes earlier options.
Coffee Supply Chain
Coffee can reach the cup even when much of its history has disappeared. Follow the chain to see what gets damaged, what money makes possible, what records can prove, and where responsibility breaks.
Processed Food Supply Chain
Follow food from biological ingredients through formulation, preservation, packaging, distribution, and consumption. The chain carries nutrition and culinary function, but each processing step creates conditions, losses, waste, and records that only partly describe what a person finally eats.
Seafood Supply Chain
Follow wild or farmed seafood through harvest, chilling, processing, sale, consumption, and residuals. Biological renewal before harvest and irreversible quality loss after it make quotas, ice, payment, identity, and feedback part of the food supply.
Sugar Supply Chain
Follow sucrose from a living cane stalk or beet root into a uniform crystal, then through food, fermentation, and residues—and see what concentration makes possible and what it disconnects.