Inner Mongolia Dian Tou Energy Corporation Ltd.
002128 · SZSE · China
Financials as of FY2025
Mines coal and burns much of it in captive power plants to smelt aluminum, earning more revenue from that metal than from coal or electricity sold directly.
- Depends onUpstream position: supplies 6 industries, depends on 3
- ScaleMarket cap is $12.75B, above the global median of $1.18B
- PositionOperating margin is 38.6%, higher than 95% of its Thermal Coal peers (median 11.3%)
- Interpretations5 currently firing — 5
What this company is and how it runs — written from structure, not news.
Coal that is mined internally splits two ways: part is sold outside the company, and part is burned in the company's own power plant. That captive electricity, together with a growing base of wind and solar generation, feeds both sales to the regional grid and the company's own aluminum smelting lines. CompanyGraph reads this as one coordinated energy-to-metal chain rather than separate mining, power and metals businesses. All of this generation depends on how much power the regional grid will actually absorb and dispatch, a limit the company names as a challenge for its renewable output and as a factor behind declining utilization at its coal-fired plant.
It earns money by selling coal, electricity and aluminum directly to industrial and grid buyers, recognising revenue at the point coal is shipped and accepted or electricity is delivered, rather than over the life of a longer contract. Of its four product lines, metal smelting now brings in the largest share of revenue, ahead of coal itself, with power generation, both coal-fired and renewable, contributing smaller shares. All sales are made directly rather than through distributors or other intermediaries.
It scales by adding discrete units of capacity: new mining reserves, additional smelting lines, new power plants, and new wind and solar sites, each requiring large, multi-year construction projects before it contributes revenue. Several such projects are underway at various stages of completion. CompanyGraph reads growth on the mining and power side as bounded by the resource remaining at existing mines, so continuing at scale depends on developing new reserves or acquiring already-integrated coal, power and metal operations elsewhere, the pattern shown by its acquisition of the Baiyinhua coal and power business. Financially, it shows a buildup of retained earnings and cash relative to its industry peers, a position that describes capacity to fund further construction rather than a description of how any specific project is actually financed.
It depends on outside suppliers for alumina and other bulk aluminum inputs, and on rail, road and port capacity to move coal and metal to buyers. Its power and smelting operations also depend on its own mines and pithead plant, which supply the coal that fuels captive generation, so a disruption in its own mining operations would flow directly into its power and aluminum output. The company names transport capacity and weather-related delivery disruption among the risks to this input flow. CompanyGraph separately places it downstream of a small number of other industries in its map of dependencies, consistent with this reliance on outside material and transport inputs.
A relatively concentrated set of direct buyers accounts for a large share of its sales: fuel-burning power, heating and coal-chemical companies buy its coal, grid operators and power users take its electricity, and nearby processors buy its aluminum. Within the coal-and-power business it most recently added, that buyer concentration runs considerably tighter than in the rest of the company, with a small number of counterparties accounting for most of that unit's sales. More broadly, it sits upstream in its regional economy, supplying more industries with inputs than it draws inputs from.
Within its peer group, several return and cash-generation measures sit in the upper part of the range rather than the middle. The company itself attributes part of its position to the fixed distance of its mines from buyers in Tongliao, Jilin, and central and southern Liaoning, and to long-standing operating and coal-trading experience. Because these are the company's own claims, CompanyGraph has not independently verified them or assessed whether competitors could reproduce them.
The company names its own operating limits as a mix rather than a single ceiling. On the coal and metal side, it points to government-set capacity and carbon-reduction restrictions, the geology of its mines, and transport capacity. On its newer renewable side, it points to how much locally generated power the regional grid can actually absorb. It describes itself as facing both demand-side and supply-side limits at once rather than a single company-wide constraint, a broader and more regulatory picture than a simple story of running down a fixed resource.
Its revenue leans heavily on its home region of Inner Mongolia, and within the coal-and-power business it most recently added, on a very small number of buyers, so a disruption to either could touch a large share of sales at once. The company also names two separate patterns of spare capacity in its own generation fleet: declining run-time at its coal-fired plant, and grid-imposed limits on how much of its wind and solar output can actually be sold, meaning a meaningful part of its built generating capacity may not be converting fully into revenue. It also carries an unresolved arbitration dispute with a trading counterparty, Glencore AG, over a long-term raw-material supply contract.
It operates under several separate regulatory approvals at once, covering mine safety, water use, pollution discharge, heat supply and electricity business, issued by different local and national authorities, and the company lists tightening environmental, energy-use and safety rules as the first pressure among its own named risks. It is exposed to price movements in coal, electricity and aluminum at the same time, to competition from imported coal, to conditions in international bauxite and energy markets that feed its aluminum business, and to an unresolved arbitration dispute with a trading counterparty, Glencore AG, over a long-term raw-material supply contract.
Read from the company's own filings and public materials (gathered August 2026) together with figures CompanyGraph recomputed from its statements. Written August 2026. A question with no evidence behind it is left out rather than answered.
Sign in to view price data.
Sign inWhat the company actually pays, and whether its own cash supports it.
The reported statements, read against the company's own industry.
5 interpretations currently present — each is a set of fired observations whose alignment reads as one structural pattern. Click an observation to see the numbers behind it.
Screen for these patternsHow does this company use capital?
Rising Operating Income With Low Depreciation on a Capital-Heavy Balance Sheet
Operating income rose four years, with small depreciation on a capital-heavy balance sheet.
Cash Backing With Revenue And Income Streaks
Revenue has risen in each of three years, profit in all three, and it holds more cash than debt.
ROE, ROA, And Operating ROA Elevated
It earns more on its equity than its industry does, and on its assets too — not on borrowing alone.
Is this company growing?
Multi-Year Revenue, Profit, And Income Growth
Revenue has risen in each of three years, gross profit in each of four, and it has made a profit in all five.
How is this stock valued?
High Retained Earnings With Profitability And Equity
Profits kept in the business fund much of what it owns, after five straight profitable years.
An interpretation is present only while every observation it reads stays fired (score ≥ 70). It describes what the aligned readings show — never a verdict, never a prediction.
Shared structure with peers — never a ranking.
Structural observations derived from financial data, industry benchmarks, and supply chain position.
Peer Positioning
Financial Health
Supply Chain
Scale
Companies that share the same coordination system — how they create, deliver, or capture value.
Companies that share active interpretations — structural patterns currently present in both stocks.