Digs coal from multiple Wyoming seams, blends it to each utility's exact specs, and ships it by rail to Midwest power plants.
At a glance
- Depends onMidstream position: 4 outgoing, 3 incoming connections
- ScaleMarket cap is above the global median
Digs coal from multiple Wyoming seams, blends it to each utility's exact specs, and ships it by rail to Midwest power plants.
What this company is and how it runs — written from structure, not news.
Peabody Energy mines coal from multiple seams across the Powder River Basin and blends the outputs at the mine site to hit the exact BTU content, sulfur levels, and ash chemistry written into each Midwest utility's supply contract. Because every utility boiler runs on a slightly different specification, any new supplier would have to spend months running boiler-testing trials before it could deliver the same blend — which means the blend recipe itself is what keeps customers locked in, not just the contract length. All of that blended coal then has to move through the Joint Line corridor in Wyoming, where BNSF controls the daily train slots, so when demand is high the rail schedule determines how much coal actually reaches the power plants regardless of how much the mines can produce. The same multi-seam commitment that makes Peabody hard to replace also makes it hard to cut costs when demand falls, because idling any single seam breaks the blend recipe tied to a specific utility contract — and if EPA regulation causes Midwest utilities to retire coal boilers altogether, the boiler-testing barrier that protects those contracts disappears along with the boilers themselves.
How does this company make money?
The company charges a per-ton price for coal, set by negotiated contracts that reflect each shipment's heat content and sulfur level — higher-quality coal commands a higher price. Rail delivery is billed separately on top of the coal price. Long-term supply contracts with utilities include a base price that adjusts over time based on fuel quality measurements and whether deliveries arrive on schedule.
What makes this company hard to replace?
Each utility's supply contract specifies exact BTU content, sulfur levels, and ash chemistry, and any new supplier has to pass months of boiler testing before it can deliver against those numbers. On top of that, utilities have built their rail car fleets and loading infrastructure around the current supplier's setup, so changing sources also means reworking logistics. Multi-year take-or-pay contracts with minimum volume commitments add a financial penalty on top of the operational cost of switching.
What limits this company?
BNSF controls how many train slots are available on the Joint Line each day, and that number is fixed regardless of how much coal the mines can actually dig. When demand is high, the rail schedule — not mine output — determines how much coal reaches customers.
What does this company depend on?
The company cannot operate without BNSF and Union Pacific rail access out of the Powder River Basin, mining permits from the Wyoming Department of Environmental Quality, dragline excavators to remove surface material at its mines, Dalrymple Bay Coal Terminal berth allocations in Queensland for export shipments, and Clean Air Act compliance certificates that allow its low-sulfur coal to be sold to utilities.
Who depends on this company?
Midwest utilities like Xcel Energy and Nebraska Public Power District rely on Powder River Basin deliveries for their daily fuel supply — if those deliveries stopped, both would have to buy replacement coal on the spot market at much higher prices. Asian utilities in Japan and South Korea that buy from the company's Australian operations would have to find other seaborne coal suppliers, likely at higher shipping costs. Unit train operators on dedicated coal corridors would lose the haulage revenue those coal runs provide.
How does this company scale?
Adding extraction in new areas of the same geological basin is relatively straightforward — the company can deploy the same standardized draglines and conveyor systems it already uses. What does not scale easily is everything that moves the coal: dedicated rail spurs, port terminals, and ship-loading facilities each take a decade or more to permit and build, so transportation capacity stays a hard ceiling on growth.
What external forces can significantly affect this company?
When natural gas from Marcellus and Permian shale production is cheap, power plant operators dispatch gas instead of coal, which cuts demand directly. Chinese government import quotas and tariffs on coal can reduce what Asian buyers purchase from the company's Australian operations. Federal carbon pricing proposals or new EPA greenhouse gas regulations could raise the effective cost of burning coal enough to accelerate boiler retirements across the Midwest customer base.
Where is this company structurally vulnerable?
If EPA greenhouse gas rules or a federal carbon price made coal-fired electricity too expensive, Midwest utilities would start shutting down coal boilers. Once a boiler is retired, there is nothing left to qualify a new blend for, and the company would be left running expensive multi-seam extraction it opened specifically to hold those now-worthless contracts.
Price is read as structure — trend, levels, range, peak and volatility drawn on the chart. It does not predict where price goes next.
Sign in to view price data.
Sign in2 interpretations currently present — each is a set of fired observations whose alignment reads as one structural pattern. Click an observation to see the numbers behind it.
Screen for these patternsHow is this stock behaving?
A high share of weekly closes over the trailing year were higher than the prior week; net income decreased across the last 4 year-over-year transitions; gross profit also decreased across the last 4 year-over-year transitions.
Two structural conditions align: (1) a multi-year price band exists where the stock has, on at least two separated occasions, stopped declining and bounced upward, and (2) current price is back inside or just above that zone after a meaningful drawdown from peak. The retest is a real one — the stock is not at a new all-time high being measured as a low.
An interpretation is present only while every observation it reads stays fired (score ≥ 70). It describes what the aligned readings show — never a verdict, never a prediction.
What the company actually pays, and whether its own cash supports it.
The reported statements, read against the company's own industry.
3 interpretations currently present — each is a set of fired observations whose alignment reads as one structural pattern. Click an observation to see the numbers behind it.
Screen for these patternsIs this company financially stable?
Three balance-sheet observations co-occur: industry-benchmarked current ratio elevated, industry-benchmarked equity ratio elevated, and total cash at MRQ at least equal to total debt. The configuration describes equity-heavy capital structure with cash covering total debt.
How does this company use capital?
Operating cash flow has trended upward on a 6-year regression while total current assets have decreased year-over-year across the trailing four years and depreciation is large relative to operating cash flow. The composition note: cash flow is rising while the current-asset base is shrinking and depreciation is a large share of the cash flow line.
Three turnover observations have aligned at the most recent annual reporting period: sales-to-receivables is high (receivables small relative to revenue), cost-of-goods-to-inventory is high (inventory small relative to COGS), and cost-of-goods-to-payables is high (accounts payable small relative to COGS, indicating fast supplier payment rather than stretched terms).
An interpretation is present only while every observation it reads stays fired (score ≥ 70). It describes what the aligned readings show — never a verdict, never a prediction.
Shared structure with peers — never a ranking.
Structural observations derived from financial data, industry benchmarks, and supply chain position.
Companies that share the same coordination system — how they create, deliver, or capture value.
Companies that share active interpretations — structural patterns currently present in both stocks.
CompanyGraph