Runs a 20,000-store convenience network across Indonesia by franchising each store to a local entrepreneur who negotiates their own land lease.
Sumber Alfaria Trijaya Tbk runs a 20,000-store convenience network across Indonesia by franchising each location to a local entrepreneur who negotiates their own site lease under a land-title system where every plot requires a separate deal with a landowner and a local government authority — a process that cannot be shortened no matter how much capital the company deploys. Because opening each store takes that same slow, non-replicable negotiation, the network took years to assemble location by location, and the aggregate of all those stores is what produces the order volume that justifies chain-level credit terms with suppliers like Unilever and Nestlé — terms no individual franchisee or new competitor could obtain on their own. Those supplier terms are what make each franchise unit economically viable, so the whole structure depends on enough franchisees staying solvent and ordering enough stock to keep Alfamart above the volume threshold the suppliers require. If a rupiah devaluation squeezed franchisee margins enough to trigger widespread store closures, aggregate orders would fall, supplier terms would deteriorate, and the economics that attract new franchisees would collapse — unraveling the network through the same franchise layer that built it.
How does this company make money?
Alfamart collects fees from franchisee-operators when they first join and then takes ongoing royalty payments as long as the store is running. It also earns a margin on the goods it sells to franchisees to stock their shelves. On top of that, suppliers like Unilever and Nestlé pay Alfamart placement fees to have their products positioned prominently on shelves inside the stores.
What makes this company hard to replace?
Local shoppers have built payment habits — specific product mixes, familiar pricing, and store layouts — around their neighborhood Alfamart, making the routine feel normal and anything else feel like extra effort. Franchisee-operators face a harder barrier: switching to a competitor system would mean giving up the physical improvements they paid to install in their store, because franchise agreements prevent them from transferring those investments to a rival network. And no competitor can offer the same supplier credit terms that Alfamart's chain-level volume unlocks — terms that are part of what makes each store's product pricing work.
What limits this company?
Opening a new store means finding a site, negotiating with the landowner, and clearing municipal permits — and none of those steps can be skipped or sped up with money. Land documentation is incomplete and rules vary by island, by district, and by individual official. There is no shortcut. That means the network can only grow as fast as those one-by-one negotiations can be completed, and no amount of investment changes that speed.
What does this company depend on?
Alfamart cannot run without five things: Indonesian rupiah banking infrastructure, which handles the daily cash flow at every store; Unilever and Nestlé distribution networks, which supply the packaged goods on the shelves; local fuel distributors, which keep backup generators running at store locations; Indonesian telecommunications networks, which keep point-of-sale systems connected; and domestic trucking networks capable of reaching store locations on rural islands.
Who depends on this company?
Indonesian households in rural areas depend on local Alfamart stores for access to packaged goods — if those stores closed, no comparable nearby alternative exists. Individual franchisee-operators depend on their store's daily cash flow as their primary livelihood. Indonesian FMCG distributors — the companies that make and move packaged goods — depend on Alfamart's store density to place their products in front of consumers in convenience-sized packaging across the country.
How does this company scale?
The parts that replicate cheaply are the standardized store format and the supplier negotiating power, both of which extend to each new location without meaningful extra cost. What does not scale is getting the location in the first place — every new Indonesian site still requires individual negotiations with a local landowner and a local government authority, and that process cannot be shortened or bypassed no matter how large the company grows.
What external forces can significantly affect this company?
A weaker Indonesian rupiah raises the cost of imported packaged goods while squeezing what shoppers can afford to pay, pressing franchisee margins from both sides. Indonesian government food security policies can change import licensing rules for essential goods, affecting what can be stocked and at what price. Ongoing urbanization is gradually pulling people away from rural areas, which puts pressure on stores in those locations that may already need to be supported by the stronger performance of stores elsewhere.
Where is this company structurally vulnerable?
If the Indonesian rupiah fell sharply in value, two things would happen at once: household shoppers would have less money to spend, and the cost of imported packaged goods that fill Alfamart's shelves would rise. If enough franchisee-operators saw their stores become unprofitable and closed, Alfamart's total order volume would drop. Once that volume falls far enough, the favorable supplier credit terms it negotiated — the terms that made franchising attractive in the first place — would weaken or disappear. At that point, the economics that make an Alfamart franchise worth running collapse, and the whole network starts to unravel from the inside.
Sign in to view price data.
Sign inScreen for dividend patterns
Find other stocks with similar dividend characteristics in the screener.
Structural observations derived from financial data, industry benchmarks, and supply chain position.
Companies that share the same coordination system — how they create, deliver, or capture value.
Companies that share active interpretations — structural patterns currently present in both stocks.
The beef supply chain is shaped by three root constraints: a biological growth cycle that delays production response by 18 to 24 months, a cold chain dependency that requires unbroken refrigeration from slaughter through retail, and processing concentration where four companies handle roughly 85% of US beef — a structure driven by the capital intensity and regulatory burden of large-scale slaughter facilities.
The processed food supply chain is shaped by three root constraints: ingredient sourcing complexity where a single product may contain 20 to 50 ingredients from a dozen countries with each ingredient carrying its own supply chain, food safety regulation where every facility, process, and ingredient must meet standards and a contamination event at any point triggers recalls across the entire distribution chain, and shelf life engineering where formulations are designed to last weeks to months but require specific preservatives, packaging, and storage conditions — making the recipe itself a supply chain constraint.
CompanyGraph