A state-controlled Chinese coal miner that washes and sells its coal directly to power and industrial buyers, and increasingly generates and sells electricity from its own plants.
- Depends onUpstream position: supplies 6 industries, depends on 3
- ScaleLevered free cash flow is -$233.47M, lower than 95% of all stocks globally
- PositionP/E ratio is 145.33×, higher than 95% of its Thermal Coal peers (median 19.37×)
- Interpretations1 currently firing — 1
What this company is and how it runs — written from structure, not news.
It coordinates a chain running from its own coal mines through on-site washing and processing and, at several locations, into its own power stations that turn coal into electricity and heat. It moves coal, electricity and heat directly to grid companies, power producers, industrial buyers and traders rather than through distributors, and it carries the operational and market risk of that chain itself because it owns and runs the mines and plants rather than contracting them out.
It makes money by directly selling the coal it mines and processes, the electricity and heat generated at its own power stations, and a smaller stream of mine-management labor services, rather than through subscriptions, commissions or usage fees. It has stayed profitable throughout the recent years covered by its financial filings.
Growth here does not happen smoothly. It comes in large, discrete steps, such as a mine-capacity expansion that needed national regulatory approval or a power plant that takes years to build, each requiring substantial upfront capital that, by the company's own account, sits tied up for a long period before it earns a return. CompanyGraph groups this company with several hundred others that scale production under the same reserve-based, capital-intensive economics.
Its own filings name the suppliers behind its equipment, construction, technology services and rail transport, and each of them is a related-party firm inside its own corporate group rather than an independent vendor. The filings also flag dependence on prevailing domestic coal and electricity supply-and-demand conditions, since shifts there move the prices of what it sells, and on managing geological and safety hazards, including water, fire, roof, gas and coal-dust risks, that come with extracting coal. CompanyGraph separately maps the company as sitting downstream of a small number of industries that supply it.
Its own filings name State Grid and China Southern Power Grid regional companies as its main electricity buyers, and describe its coal buyers as power-generation groups, local energy enterprises, industrial coal users and coal traders, with its coking coal going to steel and coking producers and its thermal coal going to power generation and building-material users. It does not disclose what share of revenue any single customer represents. CompanyGraph separately maps the company as feeding a small number of industries beyond these named buyers.
The company describes itself as the only Jiangsu provincial listed company with mineral-development capability, and states that most of its approved coal capacity sits in a few resource-rich western provinces. That is a licensed, location-based position rather than a technology or brand advantage, and it is the company's own characterization rather than something CompanyGraph has independently confirmed. Whether other companies could obtain a similar license or reserve position is not something we can see, so no claim is made about how easily this position could be copied.
Producers of a depleting resource are generally limited by how fast they can replace what comes out of the ground at a cost below what it sells for, and that is the constraint this kind of business usually tests against. In its own account, though, the limit this company names is capital: it describes coal and power projects as needing large upfront investment with long payback periods, and says planned construction and acquisitions create substantial funding needs. It also reports large coal resources and recoverable reserves on its own account, so on what is on file, funding for expansion looks like the nearer limit rather than running out of coal to mine.
The company's own risk disclosures put safety risk first, followed by funding risk and market risk, with environmental-protection risk after those. It states that swings in domestic coal and electricity supply-and-demand conditions can materially affect its results by moving the prices of what it sells, and that extracting coal exposes it to geological hazards including water, fire, roof, gas and coal-dust incidents. Nearly all of its revenue and operations sit inside one country and rest on direct sales to a concentrated set of buyer types, mainly grid companies and industrial coal users, though it does not disclose what share any single customer represents.
Its own filings name China's National Development and Reform Commission as the authority that had to approve a recent mine-capacity expansion, so growth is gated by national regulatory sign-off rather than by demand alone. In its own risk disclosures it lists safety, funding and market risk ahead of environmental-protection risk, and it reports no material litigation or arbitration pending. Nearly all of its business is conducted in its home currency, so it discloses little exposure to currency movements. Its controlling shareholder is itself controlled by a provincial government, tying the company's ownership to state authority.
Read from the company's own filings and public materials (gathered August 2026) together with figures CompanyGraph recomputed from its statements. Written September 2026. A question with no evidence behind it is left out rather than answered.
Sign in to view price data.
Sign inWhat the company actually pays, and whether its own cash supports it.
The reported statements, read against the company's own industry.
1 interpretation currently present — each is a set of fired observations whose alignment reads as one structural pattern. Click an observation to see the numbers behind it.
Screen for these patternsHow is this stock valued?
Close Below 40W SMA With Profitability
The price sits below its 40-week average, on three profitable years and cash above profit.
An interpretation is present only while every observation it reads stays fired (score ≥ 70). It describes what the aligned readings show — never a verdict, never a prediction.
Shared structure with peers — never a ranking.
Structural observations derived from financial data, industry benchmarks, and supply chain position.
Peer Positioning
Financial Health
Supply Chain
Scale
Companies that share the same coordination system — how they create, deliver, or capture value.
Companies that share active interpretations — structural patterns currently present in both stocks.