China Development Bank Financial Leasing Co., Ltd.
1606 · HKEX · China
Price data from its 2C6 listing on XSTU, quoted in EUR
cdb-leasing.comFinancials as of FY2025
It borrows in bank and bond markets to buy long lived physical assets, then earns the gap between its funding cost and what it charges businesses to lease them.
- Depends onUpstream position: supplies 6 industries, depends on 1
- ScaleMarket cap is $2.72B, above the global median of $1.18B
- FinancialsHigh earnings quality
- Interpretations2 currently firing — 2
What this company is and how it runs — written from structure, not news.
The company sits between lenders and bond investors who supply capital on one side, and businesses ranging from airlines to small enterprises that need the use of costly assets without buying them outright on the other. It coordinates the full life of each asset: acquiring it, financing it, leasing it out, managing it while leased, then remarketing or disposing of it once the lease ends, carrying the credit and asset value risk that sits between the two sides.
Income comes from two kinds of lease payments: amounts it collects under finance leases, where most of the ownership risk and reward has already passed to the customer, and rent it collects under operating leases, where it keeps that risk and reward itself. Its own reporting splits this income across aircraft, shipping, equipment, energy and smaller finance activities, but this reflects the company's own disclosure rather than an independent recalculation from comparable financial statements, which were not available for that check.
Growth here mainly comes from taking on more borrowing to fund a larger base of leased assets, rather than from selling more of a fixed-cost product to more customers. Its own disclosures show this pattern directly: it commits to buy aircraft years ahead of the deliveries and the lease income that will eventually pay for them, and it added materially to one leasing segment's asset base within a single year. CompanyGraph reads this as a leverage-driven way of scaling, shared with a broad group of similarly structured leasing and lending companies, rather than a claim about how efficiently it does so.
It depends on aircraft manufacturers for the planes it leases out, and on banks and bond investors for the funding it borrows to buy them. Its own disclosures also flag reliance on outsourced information technology services. More broadly, CompanyGraph maps it as sitting close to the input side of its industry, depending on only a small number of other industries for what it needs.
Its customers include large, listed and industry leading companies, small and micro enterprises, individual business owners and vehicle customers, and airlines and other lessees reached through its aviation leasing network across many countries. CompanyGraph separately maps it as supplying a broad range of other industries rather than a narrow one.
The underlying shape of this business, leasing assets funded by borrowed money, is common: CompanyGraph places it among a sizeable group of companies that run the same kind of leveraged leasing system. What the company itself points to as distinct is its relationship with aircraft manufacturers, a customer network spread across many countries, a newer fleet, and investment grade credit ratings, all sitting under majority ownership by a national development bank. CompanyGraph reports this as the company's own claim about itself; it has not independently tested whether other lessors could replicate the same position.
Its leases run for fixed, multi-year terms rather than being cancellable at will, so a customer that wants to change arrangements has to wait out the contract or find someone to take over the position. Under its finance leases the customer also takes on most of the economic risks and rewards of owning the asset for the life of that contract, which ties the customer's own accounting and obligations to the lease for its duration. Switching away before the contract ends means sourcing a comparable asset and financing arrangement elsewhere, not simply cancelling a subscription.
CompanyGraph's own computation shows this company's capital structure is leveraged on multiple measures at once: debt is large next to its equity, next to its total assets, and next to the cash its operations bring in. Because it functions by borrowing to fund assets and earning the gap between funding cost and lease income, the resulting limit on its scale is keeping the credit quality of that leveraged book, and the spread it earns on it, wide enough to service the borrowing behind it. Its own risk disclosures list credit risk as the first risk it manages, which is consistent with this reading.
The company itself lists credit risk as the first risk it manages, and separately names concentration in single clients, industries and regions as something it watches, alongside currency, interest rate, technology outsourcing and country level risks, including recent uncertainty tied to regional conflict tension and a past episode of aircraft held outside its control abroad. Separately, CompanyGraph's own reading of its balance sheet shows receivables have kept growing over several years and make up a large share of its current assets, a composition consistent with the same credit exposure the company names as its leading concern.
Its own disclosures point to national financial regulators in China setting the capital and risk-classification rules it must operate under. They also show cross-border exposure: aircraft have been held outside its control in Russia, and it flagged uncertainty for aircraft and ship operations in regions affected by Middle East tensions after its last reporting date. It further names a currency mismatch, since many of its aircraft and ship assets and the borrowing behind them are in US dollars while much of its other lending is in renminbi, leaving it exposed to shifts in exchange rates and interest rates.
Read from the company's own filings and public materials (gathered August 2026) together with figures CompanyGraph recomputed from its statements. Written September 2026. A question with no evidence behind it is left out rather than answered.
Sign in to view price data.
Sign inWhat the company actually pays, and whether its own cash supports it.
The reported statements, read against the company's own industry.
2 interpretations currently present — each is a set of fired observations whose alignment reads as one structural pattern. Click an observation to see the numbers behind it.
Screen for these patternsWhere is this company structurally exposed?
Elevated Leverage on Three Denominators
Debt sits high against its equity, its assets, and its cash flow.
Receivables Heavy and Growing
Money owed by customers keeps growing, and is much of its current assets.
An interpretation is present only while every observation it reads stays fired (score ≥ 70). It describes what the aligned readings show — never a verdict, never a prediction.
Shared structure with peers — never a ranking.
Structural observations derived from financial data, industry benchmarks, and supply chain position.
Financial Health
Supply Chain
Scale
Companies that share the same coordination system — how they create, deliver, or capture value.
Companies that share active interpretations — structural patterns currently present in both stocks.