A Xiamen-based Chinese commercial bank that turns customer deposits into loans and other credit services, earning from the spread between deposit costs and lending income.
- Depends onUpstream position: supplies 5 industries, depends on 0
- ScaleMarket cap is $2.86B, above the global median of $1.18B
- FinancialsLow earnings quality
What this company is and how it runs — written from structure, not news.
It sits between savers and borrowers, taking in deposits that can be withdrawn on short notice and converting them into longer-term loans. It also sits between other parties that need payments, settlements, guarantees or foreign-currency transactions handled between them, coordinating those transfers on their behalf.
It earns in two ways: the spread between what it pays for deposits and other funding and what it earns on loans and credit, and fees from services such as settlement, guarantees, bond underwriting and trading, and foreign exchange, all of which its own filings list as activities it carries out. Across the years on file, this combination has produced a profit every year.
For a bank funded mainly by deposits, growth typically comes from expanding the base of deposits and loans on the balance sheet, with leverage magnifying the result either way, rather than from unit economics that improve with size the way a factory or software product might. This way of operating is shared by a large number of similarly structured companies, so being built this way is not unusual on its own. Consistent with that pattern of steady growth, CompanyGraph's reading of its recent financial history shows book value increasing with unusual consistency.
Its core input is money placed with it by depositors, so it depends on the continued willingness of the public to hold deposits with it. It also depends on staying in good standing with the national and local financial regulators and the stock exchange named in its own filings, since its ability to take deposits and offer related services rests on that standing. CompanyGraph's mapping of industry supply relationships does not show it drawing inputs from other classified industries, though that mapping reflects a classification view rather than a measured physical supply chain.
A wide range of customers rely on it by its own account: large corporate and government-linked institutions, small and micro businesses, private enterprises, and retail and wealth-management customers. CompanyGraph's industry mapping also places it upstream of several other classified industries, meaning it is recorded as a provider those industries draw on, though this reflects a classification relationship rather than a measured contractual or physical dependency.
There is nothing on file suggesting rivals cannot replicate its underlying model. Deposit-taking and leveraged lending of this kind is run by a large number of similarly structured companies. What its own filings claim instead is a specific regional standing: a leading position by underwriting activity in its home province's interbank bond market for the period it reported. That is a claimed position in a narrow, regional measure, not evidence that the position is protected from being matched.
Its own filings on file do not state what limits its scale. The general pattern CompanyGraph tests for a bank funded mainly by deposits and other borrowed money is that its limit is the discipline of managing the gap between what it pays for funding and what it earns on loans, under leverage that magnifies both good and bad outcomes. Whether that specific limit applies to this company cannot be confirmed from what is on file.
By its own account, it operates under the active oversight of named national and local financial regulators and the exchange on which it is listed: the People's Bank of China, the China Securities Regulatory Commission, the Xiamen bureau of the National Financial Regulatory Administration, and the Shanghai Stock Exchange. These bodies set the terms under which it takes deposits, extends credit, and offers securities-related services.
Read from the company's own filings and public materials (gathered August 2026) together with figures CompanyGraph recomputed from its statements. Written September 2026. A question with no evidence behind it is left out rather than answered.
Sign in to view price data.
Sign inWhat the company actually pays, and whether its own cash supports it.
The reported statements, read against the company's own industry.
Shared structure with peers — never a ranking.
Structural observations derived from financial data, industry benchmarks, and supply chain position.
Financial Health
Supply Chain
Scale
Companies that share the same coordination system — how they create, deliver, or capture value.