Mines coal for sale and for its own use, burning part of it to generate electricity, the source of most of its revenue.
- Depends onUpstream position: supplies 6 industries, depends on 3
- ScaleMarket cap is $5.93B, above the global median of $1.18B
- PositionOperating margin is 29.3%, higher than 95% of its Thermal Coal peers (median 10.5%)
- Interpretations2 currently firing — 2
What this company is and how it runs — written from structure, not news.
The system coordinates a physical chain that starts with coal extraction, converts part of that coal directly into electricity and heat at paired mine-and-plant sites, and channels the output into a shared power grid alongside coal and power bought and sold on the open market. A dedicated internal sales arm also resells electricity sourced partly from outside the group, so the company sits inside the flow of power between its own generation and the wider grid, not only at the production end of it.
Coal is sold under individually agreed contracts and recognized once it ships and the buyer accepts it, while electricity and heat are billed monthly from metered or grid-confirmed volumes at agreed tariffs. Electricity is by far the largest source of revenue, coal sales are a secondary source and heat a minor one, and the company has recorded a profit in every year on record.
It scales mainly by adding new generating units and mines, projects that take years to build and must clear government approval before they add to revenue, rather than by simply running existing plants harder. Among the wide group of similarly structured companies CompanyGraph tracks, its returns on capital and operating margin sit toward the higher end over a multi-year view, and it turns sales into cash, and that cash into free cash flow, at an unusually high rate both against that group and against its own past.
It depends on coal, part of which comes from its own mines through direct mine-to-plant pairings and part of which it buys externally from a short list of large, named coal and energy suppliers, alongside power-generation equipment bought from named equipment manufacturers. CompanyGraph's mapping of the industries that feed into it shows only a small number of such upstream industries, fewer than the number it supplies outward.
A single buyer, the national grid operator, accounts for the large majority of its sales in the year disclosed, well beyond any other named customer, with a handful of other named industrial and utility buyers making up the rest. CompanyGraph's mapping shows it supplying several downstream industries overall, but its actual revenue is concentrated in that one counterparty far more than a simple count of downstream industries would suggest.
Its profitability and cash conversion sit toward the top of a wide group of other companies that CompanyGraph reads as running the same kind of coal-extraction-to-power system, which reflects a shared way of operating rather than evidence that these companies move together or compete directly. The company itself attributes this position to its location within Shaanxi's coal-producing area, the coordination between its own mines and its own power plants, and the size of the coal reserves it has retained there.
CompanyGraph's default expectation for a coal-extraction business is that the binding limit is the cost of replacing depleted reserves. This company's own account points elsewhere: it describes its retained coal reserves as ample and ranking among the largest in the province, and instead names government approval of new mines and power plants, access to well-located project allocations, and a demand-side ceiling from renewable capacity outgrowing electricity demand, as what actually shapes how much it can add.
The company's own disclosures show the large majority of a year's sales flowing through a single buyer, the national grid operator, so that buyer's purchasing and payment behavior has an outsized effect on the business even though the company describes that counterparty's credit as reliable. It also names safety incidents in coal mining as its foremost risk, a concern its own filings corroborate with an actual safety penalty in the same year, alongside a separately named risk from the shift toward market-based electricity pricing and renewable competition.
The company's own risk disclosures name safety regulation in coal mining as its first-listed pressure, followed by the wider energy system's shift toward non-fossil generation, the volatility of coal prices as an input cost, and the move toward market-based rather than fully administered electricity pricing. It specifically describes renewable generation capacity growing faster than electricity demand as pressure on how many hours its coal-fired plants run, and its own filings record an actual safety penalty during the year alongside the general safety risk it names.
Read from the company's own filings and public materials (gathered August 2026) together with figures CompanyGraph recomputed from its statements. Written August 2026. A question with no evidence behind it is left out rather than answered.
Sign in to view price data.
Sign inWhat the company actually pays, and whether its own cash supports it.
The reported statements, read against the company's own industry.
2 interpretations currently present — each is a set of fired observations whose alignment reads as one structural pattern. Click an observation to see the numbers behind it.
Screen for these patternsHow does this company use capital?
Cash-Flow Ratios Elevated
More of its sales turn into cash than in its industry, and less of that cash is consumed by reinvestment than at most of its peers.
Industry-Benchmarked ROA and Margin Elevated
Returns and margins have sat in the top of its industry across five years.
An interpretation is present only while every observation it reads stays fired (score ≥ 70). It describes what the aligned readings show — never a verdict, never a prediction.
Shared structure with peers — never a ranking.
Structural observations derived from financial data, industry benchmarks, and supply chain position.
Peer Positioning
Financial Health
Supply Chain
Scale
Companies that share the same coordination system — how they create, deliver, or capture value.
Companies that share active interpretations — structural patterns currently present in both stocks.