A state-controlled coal miner that extracts, washes and sells coal directly to steel, power and chemical producers, with smaller chemical and materials businesses built on the side.
- Depends onUpstream position: supplies 6 industries, depends on 3
- ScaleMarket cap is $2.65B, above the global median of $1.18B
- FinancialsAltman Z-Score 0.88: distress zone
- Interpretations1 currently firing — 1
What this company is and how it runs — written from structure, not news.
It sits between its own coal mines and industrial buyers, running a sales function that sets prices and manages contracts and collections, paired with a delivery network that coordinates rail, road and port transport to move coal from mine to buyer. CompanyGraph's mapping of the industry places it as a supplier into six downstream industries while itself depending on a smaller number of supplying industries upstream, consistent with a position in the middle of a physical supply chain rather than at either end.
Money comes almost entirely from selling coal, with much smaller amounts from chemicals, building materials and electricity; the coal is sold under contracts whose prices are set by an internal pricing committee rather than a single posted market price. The company has reported a profit in every year on file, and in the most recent year the cash generated from operations exceeded the profit it reported.
Growth here does not come from simply running existing operations harder. Its own disclosures describe expansion as a series of discrete projects: developing new mining districts, expanding mine boundaries, and building processing and downstream chemical or materials capacity, each requiring its own permits and capital spending, with mines outside its home province facing additional policy hurdles. That pattern is consistent with the general dynamic CompanyGraph tests for businesses built on a depleting resource, where growth depends on developing new extraction capacity rather than scaling a fixed plant, though here the company frames the binding step as regulatory approval as much as the physical resource itself.
CompanyGraph's mapping of the industry places it downstream of a small number of supplying industries. Its own account is more specific: it names a cluster of related-party suppliers that provide materials, coal, equipment, construction work and services, and it separately states that its coal business depends on the broader pace of domestic economic growth and on supply-demand conditions it does not control.
CompanyGraph's mapping of the industry places it as a supplier into six downstream industries. Its own account names who specifically buys its two coal products: steelmakers take coking coal, while electricity generators, building-materials makers and chemical producers take thermal coal. A single customer accounts for a meaningful share of total sales, and its name carries the same 'Jizhong Energy Fengfeng Group' affiliation as one of the company's own major shareholders and as one of its named suppliers, a naming overlap CompanyGraph draws from the disclosed names themselves rather than from any explicit related-party statement in the filing.
CompanyGraph places this business among several hundred companies worldwide that run the same kind of resource-extraction system, so this particular structural shape is common rather than rare. The company itself points to the location of its reserves, its integrated rail, road and port delivery network, and its ability to blend different coal grades to order as what sets it apart, though it does not offer a market-share figure to support the leadership position it claims for itself in its home province.
The company's own account names production bottlenecks and permitting as limits on growth: it describes needing faster approval to expand a mine boundary, to acquire the remaining resources at another mine, and to complete exploration-to-mining conversion procedures at a third site, and it notes that operating mines outside its home province means clearing additional policy hurdles. This lines up with the broader pattern CompanyGraph tests for resource-extraction businesses, where growth depends on replacing depleted reserves at a workable cost, though here the company frames the limit specifically as regulatory approval rather than the physical resource base itself.
Safety sits among the risks the company names first in its own disclosures, and that carries direct stakes for an underground mining operation in a way it would not for many other kinds of business. Its revenue is concentrated heavily in a single region of China rather than spread across the country, and one disclosed customer accounts for a meaningful share of total sales, so a regional disruption, a safety incident, or a change at that one customer would not be easily absorbed elsewhere. The company also carries a running caseload of smaller litigation and arbitration matters, most already resolved, without an expected liability flagged against them.
The company's own risk disclosures put environmental compliance, coal-price movements and workplace safety at the top of the list, and describe its coal business as tied to broader domestic economic growth and to demand from the electricity, steel, building-materials and chemical industries. It operates under state mineral-licensing rules, with at least one mine licence still in process at the time of its most recent filing, and under securities regulation from national and exchange authorities. Because a provincial state body is also its controlling shareholder, government exposure here runs through ownership as well as through regulation.
Read from the company's own filings and public materials (gathered August 2026) together with figures CompanyGraph recomputed from its statements. Written August 2026. A question with no evidence behind it is left out rather than answered.
Sign in to view price data.
Sign inWhat the company actually pays, and whether its own cash supports it.
The reported statements, read against the company's own industry.
1 interpretation currently present — each is a set of fired observations whose alignment reads as one structural pattern. Click an observation to see the numbers behind it.
Screen for these patternsHow is this stock valued?
Close Below 40W SMA With Profitability
The price sits below its 40-week average, on three profitable years and cash above profit.
An interpretation is present only while every observation it reads stays fired (score ≥ 70). It describes what the aligned readings show — never a verdict, never a prediction.
Shared structure with peers — never a ranking.
Structural observations derived from financial data, industry benchmarks, and supply chain position.
Financial Health
Supply Chain
Scale
Companies that share the same coordination system — how they create, deliver, or capture value.
Companies that share active interpretations — structural patterns currently present in both stocks.