It buys aircraft and ships with borrowed money, then earns its income from the spread between its funding cost and the lease payments it collects from airlines and shipping operators.
- Depends onUpstream position: supplies 6 industries, depends on 1
- ScaleLevered free cash flow is -$3.04B, lower than 95% of all stocks globally
- FinancialsHigh earnings quality
- Interpretations4 currently firing — 4
What this company is and how it runs — written from structure, not news.
The system sits between lenders that supply capital and transport operators that need aircraft or vessels without owning them outright, turning borrowed money into physical assets placed into service under lease while carrying the funding, credit and residual value risk itself. In CompanyGraph's industry map it feeds more industries downstream than it draws from upstream.
Revenue comes from lease payments on the aircraft and vessels it owns, funded mainly through borrowing weighted toward long-term debt, and in the years on file it has converted sales into operating cash at a high rate while collecting receivables quickly and needing relatively little of that cash for reinvestment. Earnings have been positive in the most recent years on file but not across the entire period, since an earlier year on record shows a loss.
CompanyGraph reads its way of scaling as expanding a borrowed balance sheet, taking on more long-term debt to acquire more aircraft and vessels and then earning the margin between funding cost and lease income across a larger asset base, rather than scaling by spreading fixed costs over more volume. This pattern of heavy, long-term-weighted borrowing, together with its place among a recognized group of other companies CompanyGraph classifies under the same leveraged, margin-based system, points to growth funded mainly by new borrowing rather than by reinvesting cash generated internally.
In CompanyGraph's industry mapping, Bohai Leasing's upstream footprint is narrow rather than broad, and it settles what it owes suppliers relatively quickly rather than relying on stretched trade credit. Its heavy borrowing, weighted toward long-term debt, shows that acquiring new aircraft and vessels depends structurally on continued access to lenders and credit markets rather than on internally generated cash alone.
Bohai Leasing feeds more downstream industries than it draws from upstream in CompanyGraph's mapping, consistent with leased assets passing into use across a wider set of users than its own supply base. Its own reporting names one customer, Perseus Aviation, among its largest accounts for a modest share of total sales, while its other largest customers are not identified by name in what CompanyGraph can see.
CompanyGraph classifies a sizeable group of other companies as running the same kind of leveraged, margin-based leasing system as Bohai Leasing, so this operating shape is common rather than rare. Whether anything specific, such as relationships, pricing access, or asset sourcing, stops another lessor from copying it is not something CompanyGraph can see in the data on file.
The way CompanyGraph classifies this industry treats its growth as limited less by physical capacity than by how much debt it can raise, at what cost, and by keeping the credit quality of its leased assets and counterparties strong enough that deterioration in either does not overwhelm its leverage. This is a general pattern carried over from how CompanyGraph classifies the industry it sits in, not a limit the company has stated about itself, and CompanyGraph cannot yet confirm whether it holds for this specific company.
The company's own reporting shows part of its revenue tied to a small number of large customer accounts, one of which is named and on its own accounts for a modest share of total sales. Because most of its other largest customers are not identified by name, CompanyGraph cannot see how concentrated the remainder of its revenue is, or what would happen to it if one of these relationships ended.
The way CompanyGraph classifies this industry points to the cost and availability of debt funding as a central outside pressure, since profitability under this kind of system depends on the margin between what it pays lenders and what it earns leasing out its assets; a rise in funding costs or a tightening of credit access would press on that margin. CompanyGraph does not have company-specific disclosures on file, such as named regulators, legal proceedings or trade exposures, to add a more specific picture for this company.
Read from the company's own filings and public materials (gathered August 2026) together with figures CompanyGraph recomputed from its statements. Written August 2026. A question with no evidence behind it is left out rather than answered.
Sign in to view price data.
Sign inThe reported statements, read against the company's own industry.
4 interpretations currently present — each is a set of fired observations whose alignment reads as one structural pattern. Click an observation to see the numbers behind it.
Screen for these patternsIs this company financially stable?
Debt Financing Activity
More cash moved through borrowing and repaying than through the business itself, and most of its debt is long-term.
Long-Term Debt A High Share Of Total Liabilities, Short-Term Debt A High Share Of Current Liabilities
Borrowing makes up most of what it owes, both the long-dated part and the part due soon.
How does this company use capital?
Cash-Flow Ratios Elevated
More of its sales turn into cash than in its industry, and less of that cash is consumed by reinvestment than at most of its peers.
Three Turnover Ratios Elevated
Collects fast, clears inventory fast, and pays suppliers fast too.
An interpretation is present only while every observation it reads stays fired (score ≥ 70). It describes what the aligned readings show — never a verdict, never a prediction.
Shared structure with peers — never a ranking.
Structural observations derived from financial data, industry benchmarks, and supply chain position.
Structural Tensions
Financial Health
Supply Chain
Scale
Companies that share the same coordination system — how they create, deliver, or capture value.
Companies that share active interpretations — structural patterns currently present in both stocks.