Converts metals, motors and plastic components into fluid- and powder-handling equipment, earning through one-time equipment sales to industrial and contractor buyers rather than recurring subscriptions or usage fees.
- Depends onDownstream position: depends on 12 industries, supplies 6
- ScaleMarket cap is $12.89B, above the global median of $1.18B
- PositionGross margin is 53.7%, higher than 95% of its Specialty Industrial Machinery peers (median 34.8%)
- Interpretations7 currently firing — 7
What this company is and how it runs — written from structure, not news.
The system takes in materials and components sourced across many industries and converts them into finished fluid- and powder-handling equipment, then hands that equipment to distributors, retailers and other intermediaries who configure or incorporate it for a narrower set of customer industries. It sits closer to the end of its supply chain, drawing on more industries than it supplies to.
Revenue comes from selling equipment outright, recognized once control passes to the buyer, typically at shipment, rather than from subscriptions or usage-based fees. Some of that revenue is bundled with design, installation or licensing services attached to the equipment sale. Sales split across contractor customers, industrial customers and a smaller group of other end markets, with short-term payment terms rather than long-term financing extended to buyers.
CompanyGraph's recomputation of the reported financial statements confirms positive net income across recent fiscal years, a sustained record of profitability. Over that period, several cash-flow and balance-sheet measures, including operating cash flow, free cash flow and liquidity, sit in the higher part of their range compared with industry peers, with capital spending taking a comparatively small share of operating cash flow and cash covering most of total debt. Businesses built around converting physical inputs into finished equipment, the category CompanyGraph places this company in, generally scale by adding physical conversion capacity rather than through near-costless replication, though that is a starting expectation for the category rather than something separately measured here.
Graco depends on suppliers across a wide range of upstream industries for metals, motors, plastics and electronic components, with a share of that sourcing coming from outside the United States, particularly Asia, and some inputs identified as single-sourced. Its own account also names dependence on a small number of large distribution partners in its contractor channel, on skilled personnel, and on the information systems and intellectual property protections that support the business.
Contractor customers, including professional painters, specialty tradespeople and do-it-yourself buyers, and industrial customers across sectors such as vehicle production, aerospace, marine, food and beverage, and pharmaceutical manufacturing rely on this equipment to move, mix, control or spray fluids and powders in their own operations. Within both the contractor and industrial customer groups, a single customer accounts for a large, concentrated share of worldwide sales, a pattern that has held steady across recent years.
This company's own account names product quality, reliability, innovation, design, customer support, specialized engineering and manufacturing capability as the basis of its competitive position, rather than a single protected asset. CompanyGraph's mapping of companies that operate the same way, converting inputs into equipment at a throughput-limited rate, finds many other companies doing the same, indicating that this way of operating is common rather than distinctive. Whether the specific engineering, quality or service capabilities named are things rivals cannot reproduce is not something CompanyGraph can measure from the evidence available.
Businesses that convert physical inputs into finished equipment are generally expected to be limited by how much physical conversion capacity, plant capability and machining and assembly time they have available, and by whether the materials and components needed to run that capacity can be obtained. That is a starting expectation for this category of business, not something CompanyGraph has separately measured here. This company's own filings are consistent with parts of that picture: they name dependence on globally sourced, and in some cases single-sourced, inputs, describe using outside subcontract services to supplement its own factories, and name dependence on qualified personnel to run its operations.
This company's own filings point to several potential points of strain. Demand across its contractor and industrial customer base moves with worldwide economic activity, so a broad slowdown in commercial and industrial activity affects it directly. Within its largest customer groups, a single customer in each has accounted for a large, concentrated share of worldwide sales in every recent year, so losing any one of those relationships would concentrate its effect on a large part of revenue. The company also names reliance on a few large distribution partners in its contractor channel, on some single-sourced and globally sourced inputs including suppliers in China, and on maintaining its information systems and intellectual property protections, any of which it identifies as a dependency that could be disrupted.
This company's own filings name broad economic activity, currency movement, political instability and interest-rate and credit conditions as the pressures it lists first, with demand tied to the level of commercial and industrial activity worldwide. It also names exposure to export controls, customs processes, trade sanctions, tariffs and retaliatory trade measures, noting that higher tariffs have raised the cost of imported materials and components while foreign retaliatory tariffs have raised prices for its buyers in some markets. More generally, businesses that convert physical inputs into finished goods are exposed to whether materials and components can be sourced and fed into production at the rate their plants are built to run, though that broader exposure is a category-level expectation rather than something CompanyGraph has separately confirmed here.
Read from the company's own filings and public materials (gathered August 2026) together with figures CompanyGraph recomputed from its statements. Written September 2026. A question with no evidence behind it is left out rather than answered.
Sign in to view price data.
Sign inWhat the company actually pays, and whether its own cash supports it.
The reported statements, read against the company's own industry.
7 interpretations currently present — each is a set of fired observations whose alignment reads as one structural pattern. Click an observation to see the numbers behind it.
Screen for these patternsIs this company financially stable?
MRQ Cash Elevated Relative To Total Debt With EBITDA And FCF Elevated Relative To Total Liabilities
Cash covers most of its debt, with earnings high against its liabilities.
Liquidity Ratios Elevated
It can cover near-term bills from cash alone, not just from inventory.
Low-Leverage Liquidity Configuration
Cash on hand covers most or all of its debt, and its equity share of assets is high for its industry.
How does this company use capital?
Cash-Flow Ratios Elevated
More of its sales turn into cash than in its industry, and less of that cash is consumed by reinvestment than at most of its peers.
FCF Ratios Elevated
Its free cash flow is large next to assets and equity, and more of its operating cash reaches it than in its industry.
How is this stock valued?
Down-Close Streak With Profitability
A run of down weeks on a company profitable three years running and funded by equity.
High Retained Earnings With Profitability And Equity
Profits kept in the business fund much of what it owns, after five straight profitable years.
An interpretation is present only while every observation it reads stays fired (score ≥ 70). It describes what the aligned readings show — never a verdict, never a prediction.
Shared structure with peers — never a ranking.
Structural observations derived from financial data, industry benchmarks, and supply chain position.
Peer Positioning
Financial Health
Supply Chain
Scale
Companies that share the same coordination system — how they create, deliver, or capture value.
Companies that share active interpretations — structural patterns currently present in both stocks.