Runs North America's largest network of licensed facilities that legally destroy industrial hazardous waste that cannot go anywhere else.
Clean Harbors collects, transports, and destroys the hazardous waste — from chemical plants, pharmaceutical manufacturers, and oil refineries — that federal law under RCRA prohibits from entering ordinary municipal landfills or sewers. Each of Clean Harbors' incinerators, chemical stabilization units, and hazardous landfills holds a separate permit for specific waste codes at that specific location, and because those permits take five to ten years to obtain against sustained community opposition, no competitor can simply build a rival facility when industrial demand grows. When a factory's on-site storage for a regulated waste code fills up, its production line stops until a contracted facility with the matching permit takes delivery — so customers have no real alternative unless Clean Harbors already holds the right permit, which locks the relationship in well before any pricing negotiation happens. The main thing that could undermine the whole structure is tightened EPA emission standards: retrofitting every kiln to meet new air-quality thresholds costs money continuously, and any facility that fails an emissions check faces a mandatory shutdown that breaks the permitted-capacity pairing — though competitors face the same retrofit requirement with smaller balance sheets to absorb it.
How does this company make money?
The company charges a per-ton fee for every load of hazardous waste it accepts, with the rate varying by waste classification and the treatment method required. Waste streams that can only be handled by incineration carry premium pricing over waste that can be stabilized or landfilled. When a chemical spill or industrial accident requires an emergency response, the company bills hourly mobilization rates on top of separate fees for equipment deployed during the cleanup.
What makes this company hard to replace?
Switching to a different hazardous waste vendor requires a company's internal environmental health and safety team to run a full qualification check — verifying the new vendor's RCRA permits and insurance coverage before a single shipment can move. Ongoing waste streams are tracked through manifest systems that are already integrated into the customer's own inventory software. Emergency response contracts go further: equipment is physically pre-positioned at or near customer sites, and that equipment cannot be quickly moved to a new provider.
What limits this company?
Getting a permit to open or expand a hazardous waste facility under RCRA Part B takes 5 to 10 years and almost always faces strong local opposition. That means the company cannot build new capacity just because demand is rising. The total tonnage the existing permitted facilities are legally allowed to accept is the hard ceiling — not money, not equipment.
What does this company depend on?
The company cannot operate without RCRA Part B permits for each disposal facility, DOT hazmat transportation licenses for its collection vehicles, specialized incineration equipment rated for specific waste types, railroad access for bulk hazardous waste shipments, and EPA-certified treatment chemicals used in its stabilization processes.
Who depends on this company?
Chemical manufacturers whose production lines shut down the moment their on-site hazardous waste storage is full. Pharmaceutical companies whose FDA manufacturing compliance requires proper destruction of off-specification batches. Oil refineries whose scheduled maintenance work depends on coordinated removal of tank bottom sludges and contaminated catalyst materials. If this company stopped operating, those production lines and maintenance schedules would halt with no legal alternative large enough to absorb the volume.
How does this company scale?
Adding more customers within existing service areas improves how efficiently the company fills trucks and runs its incinerators — those gains are real and relatively cheap. What does not scale easily is permitted capacity itself. Regulatory approval timelines and community opposition mean new facilities cannot be built in response to demand, so growth is bounded by the tonnage ceilings already embedded in the existing permit portfolio.
What external forces can significantly affect this company?
Expanding PFAS regulations are broadening the definition of what counts as hazardous waste, which increases demand but also requires specialized treatment the existing facilities may need to add. Cross-border trade restrictions can limit how freely waste moves between US and Canadian facilities in the network. Carbon pricing regimes raise the operating cost of high-temperature incineration, which runs continuously at very high energy use.
Where is this company structurally vulnerable?
If the EPA significantly tightens air-emission rules for high-temperature incineration, every kiln and plasma arc unit would need expensive pollution-control upgrades to keep its operating permit. A facility that fails an emissions test faces a mandatory shutdown. That shutdown voids the permitted throughput at that site — and no competitor can absorb the displaced waste quickly, because every competitor faces the same retrofit requirement with less money to execute it.
Sign in to view price data.
Sign inScreen for dividend patterns
Find other stocks with similar dividend characteristics in the screener.
Structural observations derived from financial data, industry benchmarks, and supply chain position.
Companies that share the same coordination system — how they create, deliver, or capture value.
Companies that share active interpretations — structural patterns currently present in both stocks.
CompanyGraph