Breaks down large chip shipments into small orders for defense, aerospace, and industrial buyers from warehouses that U.S. law requires to be specially certified.
Arrow Electronics takes semiconductor shipments from manufacturers like Intel, Broadcom, and Qualcomm — which arrive in production lot sizes too large for any single defense or aerospace buyer to absorb — and breaks them into smaller deliveries through ITAR-certified warehouses that U.S. law requires for handling export-controlled chips. Because the government issues those facility certifications and personnel clearances only after multi-year vetting, a new competitor with full capital cannot legally enter this channel until it completes the same cycle, which means Arrow's allocation relationships with major chip manufacturers for export-controlled products are only available to the small group of distributors that already passed that process. The same legal specificity that locks competitors out also locks Arrow in: the certified facilities are built and staffed exclusively for export-controlled handling, so if U.S. defense procurement contracts sharply or export-control rules are restructured, those facilities cannot simply be redeployed into commercial distribution. Sitting underneath all of this is an inventory problem that never fully goes away — Arrow must commit to minimum purchase volumes with chip manufacturers before defense customers have confirmed their orders, so the gap between what it has bought and what it has sold is the main constraint on how efficiently the business uses its capital across more than 90 countries.
How does this company make money?
The company earns a margin on every semiconductor and computing hardware sale — the difference between what it pays manufacturers like Intel, Broadcom, Qualcomm, Dell, and HPE and what it charges customers. It also receives volume rebates from manufacturers when it hits annual purchase targets. On top of that, it charges fees for extra services like configuring components, bundling parts into kits, and managing supply chains for industrial and enterprise customers.
What makes this company hard to replace?
Defense and aerospace customers cannot simply find another supplier, because ITAR facility certifications and security clearances take years to obtain and only a small number of distributors have them. Industrial and telecom customers are also held in place by inventory management systems that have been built directly into their own purchasing workflows — replacing those connections takes significant time and IT work. On top of that, new distributors cannot easily get the same chip allocation agreements with major manufacturers, because those agreements are tied to years of proven purchase volume.
What limits this company?
Before a single customer order comes in, the company must commit to buying minimum quantities from Intel, Broadcom, Qualcomm, and other chip makers. Defense and aerospace customers do not order on predictable schedules, so there is often a gap between chips the company has already paid for and chips customers have actually ordered. That gap — sitting inventory financed with borrowed money — is what limits how efficiently the business can grow.
What does this company depend on?
The company cannot operate without semiconductor allocation agreements with Intel, Broadcom, Qualcomm, and other major chip makers. It also relies on U.S. government export control licenses to legally ship defense and aerospace chips, credit facilities to pay for inventory held across its global warehouse network, and distribution agreements with Dell, HPE, and other server and computing hardware makers. Cross-border trade compliance infrastructure — the legal and logistical machinery for moving technology products across country lines — is also essential.
Who depends on this company?
Defense contractors running classified programs would stall if they lost access to export-controlled semiconductors, because this company is one of the few distributors legally able to supply them. Industrial automation manufacturers depend on its just-in-time chip deliveries to keep production lines running. Telecommunications providers rolling out 5G and fiber networks rely on the specialized RF and optical components it stocks. Smaller regional electronics resellers also depend on the credit terms the company extends, which is how those resellers finance their own inventory.
How does this company scale?
Warehouse automation and smarter regional inventory placement get cheaper and more efficient as the company expands into more markets, so fulfilling small orders across more countries does not require proportionally more cost. What does not get easier with growth is managing relationships with chip makers: allocation agreements with Intel, Broadcom, Qualcomm, and others require direct negotiations at the executive level, and there are only so many of those conversations that can happen at once, no matter how large the company gets.
What external forces can significantly affect this company?
U.S.-China technology export restrictions limit which Chinese companies can receive semiconductors and make supply chain routing more complicated. When the Federal Reserve raises interest rates, the cost of borrowing money to hold inventory across 90-plus countries rises directly. A surge in demand from the automotive industry as it shifts to electric vehicles can also create sudden competition for the same chip allocations the company depends on, leaving less supply available for its industrial and defense customers.
Where is this company structurally vulnerable?
If U.S. defense spending drops sharply, or if the government restructures export-control rules in a way that reclassifies the specific chip categories flowing through these certified facilities, those facilities lose their purpose. Because the buildings and staff are built around export-controlled handling, they cannot simply be switched over to serve commercial customers — the same specialization that locks competitors out also locks the company in.
Sign in to view price data.
Sign inScreen for dividend patterns
Find other stocks with similar dividend characteristics in the screener.
Structural observations derived from financial data, industry benchmarks, and supply chain position.
Companies that share the same coordination system — how they create, deliver, or capture value.
Companies that share active interpretations — structural patterns currently present in both stocks.
CompanyGraph