A state-controlled Chinese operator that converts coal into electricity and heat sold mainly to a single regional grid company and city heating systems, while also mining and selling coal directly.
- Depends onMidstream position: 6 outgoing, 5 incoming connections
- ScaleMarket cap is $1.67B, above the global median of $1.18B
- FinancialsAltman Z-Score 0.46: distress zone
- Interpretations1 currently firing — 1
What this company is and how it runs — written from structure, not news.
The system takes in coal and other fuel and converts it, inside its own generating, cogeneration and mining units, into electricity, heat and separately sold commercial coal. It then moves that output to grid companies, city heating networks and coal buyers, and coordinates a layer of market-facing services around its physical output: matching its generation to power-market demand, aggregating load and taking part in emerging carbon and green-certificate mechanisms.
It earns revenue from selling several physical outputs, electricity, heat and coal, with prices set through a mix of administered rates and market-trading mechanisms rather than one uniform price list. Revenue is recognized once a buyer takes control of the delivered power, heat or coal.
Growth here comes from adding or replacing physical generating and mining capacity, project by project, rather than from scaling a product at near-zero marginal cost. The expansion projects the company discloses are new or replacement power and wind units built alongside its existing plants, the same throughput-limited growth pattern shared by a large group of companies that run physical conversion plants of this kind.
Its generating and heating operations depend on a continuous supply of fuel coal, most of it secured through long-term contracts, with the remainder bought on market bidding platforms as needed. Key engineering, automation and technical-service inputs come from companies affiliated with its own controlling group rather than from independent outside vendors.
A single regional electricity grid company accounts for close to half of its annual sales, making that one buyer central to its revenue. Beyond that, several northeastern Chinese cities rely on it as their heating supplier for a large residential population, and buyers across multiple provinces purchase its coal.
The company reports the largest thermal-power capacity and a majority share of heat supply in several core cities within its home province. That position is built on physical generating plant and heat-distribution networks already in place in those specific cities.
The company's own disclosures point to a regulatory and pricing limit on growth: an incomplete mechanism for adjusting the price it can charge for heat, and a need to secure government construction quotas before adding new renewable capacity. This sits alongside a more general pattern for companies that convert a fixed input into power at physical plants, where scale is normally capped by how much of that plant can be run and fed, which CompanyGraph treats as an assumption still to be tested for this company rather than a confirmed fact.
CompanyGraph's reading of its financial structure shows several solvency signals converging at once: an elevated multi-factor distress score, debt that makes up a large share of total assets, and debt that is large relative to the cash its operations generate. Together they point to financial pressure worth watching, in a business that also relies on a single regional grid company for close to half of its revenue.
The company names coal-market conditions, electricity and carbon-market rules, the heating market, environmental rules and power-project construction as the outside pressures it tracks most closely, in that order. It also points to competition from renewable energy, more volatile power prices, and growing difficulty locking in multi-year power-sale contracts as pressures on its position, alongside oversight from national energy, securities and mine-safety regulators.
Read from the company's own filings and public materials (gathered August 2026) together with figures CompanyGraph recomputed from its statements. Written September 2026. A question with no evidence behind it is left out rather than answered.
Sign in to view price data.
Sign inThe reported statements, read against the company's own industry.
1 interpretation currently present — each is a set of fired observations whose alignment reads as one structural pattern. Click an observation to see the numbers behind it.
Screen for these patternsWhere is this company structurally exposed?
Within or Near the Altman Distress Zone
Debt is a large share of its assets, and large against its cash flow.
An interpretation is present only while every observation it reads stays fired (score ≥ 70). It describes what the aligned readings show — never a verdict, never a prediction.
Shared structure with peers — never a ranking.
Structural observations derived from financial data, industry benchmarks, and supply chain position.
Financial Health
Supply Chain
Scale
Companies that share the same coordination system — how they create, deliver, or capture value.
Companies that share active interpretations — structural patterns currently present in both stocks.