600482 · SSE · China
china-csicpower.com.cnFinancials as of FY2025
Builds People's Liberation Army Navy destroyers and commercial ships at state-owned drydocks in Dalian and Shanghai.
What this company is and how it runs — written from structure, not news.
China Shipbuilding Industry Co., Ltd. converts classified People's Liberation Army Navy blueprints — specifying hull geometry, wiring runs, and combat-system mounting points for vessels like the Type 055 destroyer — into finished warships and commercial vessels through state-designated drydocks at Dalian and Shanghai. The Central Military Commission releases those blueprints only to yards sitting inside the China State Shipbuilding Corporation's ownership structure, which means no private Chinese yard and no foreign shipbuilder can legally receive them, so the specification-to-hull conversion step cannot be replicated with money or engineering talent alone. Because each construction phase — steel cutting, outfitting, sea trials — is gated by drydock availability, the military procurement calendar and the physical drydock schedule become the same constraint, and adding a drydock requires years of permitting and dredging that no amount of capital can compress. If the Central Military Commission were to redirect naval contracts to a different yard already inside the same ownership chain, or simply order fewer destroyers, the classified specification pipeline would go quiet, the drydocks would fill with lower-margin commercial hulls, and the one thing that makes this company irreplaceable to the People's Liberation Army Navy would disappear.
How does this company make money?
The company is paid in stages as each vessel is built, with milestone payments triggered by events like the start of steel cutting and the completion of sea trials. On top of those construction contracts, it earns revenue through long-term service agreements that cover maintenance and retrofits over the 20 to 30 year working life of each vessel.
What makes this company hard to replace?
Naval vessels need decades-long maintenance contracts, and only the original builder holds the full equipment specifications required to service them. Military customers are also locked in by the integration between these vessels and Chinese naval communication systems, which a new yard could not easily replicate. Any customer trying to move to a different shipbuilder for specialized vessel types would face a multi-year process to qualify that new yard — during which they would have no alternative source of supply.
What limits this company?
The number and size of ships that can be built at any one time is capped by the physical dimensions and crane capacity of the existing drydocks at Dalian and Shanghai. Adding a new drydock takes years of government permitting and dredging work. More money cannot speed that process up, so even when steel and workers are ready, throughput cannot be increased to clear a backlog.
What does this company depend on?
The company cannot operate without high-grade marine steel from Baosteel, marine diesel engines built to licensed MAN designs, naval combat systems supplied by China Electronics Technology Group, access to the deepwater port berths at Dalian and Shanghai for launching completed vessels, and approval from the Central Military Commission to receive the classified specifications that initiate every naval build.
Who depends on this company?
The People's Liberation Army Navy would lose its domestic source of destroyers and submarines if naval production stopped. China COSCO Shipping would face delays building out its container and bulk carrier fleet. Chinese offshore oil operations in the South China Sea would lose access to the specialized support vessels those platforms rely on.
How does this company scale?
Steel cutting and welding can be spread across more berths and additional shifts to push more work through the yard at once. But drydock capacity — the physical ceiling on how many hulls can be under construction simultaneously — can only grow through years of permitting and dredging that extra capital cannot compress. So throughput can be tuned within existing drydocks, but the hard ceiling cannot be raised quickly no matter how much money is available.
What external forces can significantly affect this company?
U.S. export controls block access to Western marine propulsion technology and navigation systems, forcing reliance on domestic or non-Western alternatives. Swings in the renminbi affect how price-competitive Chinese-built vessels are when sold to international buyers. International Maritime Organization emissions rules require existing vessel designs to be retrofitted, adding cost and engineering work to ships already in service.
Where is this company structurally vulnerable?
If the Central Military Commission reassigned destroyer and submarine contracts to a different yard already inside the China State Shipbuilding Corporation structure — or simply ordered fewer naval vessels — the flow of classified specifications into this company's facilities would stop. Without those documents, its drydocks become ordinary large shipyards, indistinguishable from any other Chinese commercial yard and unable to command the same contracts.
Price is read as structure — trend, levels, range, peak and volatility drawn on the chart. It does not predict where price goes next.
Sign in to view price data.
Sign inWhat the company actually pays, and whether its own cash supports it.
The reported statements, read against the company's own industry.
5 interpretations currently present — each is a set of fired observations whose alignment reads as one structural pattern. Click an observation to see the numbers behind it.
Screen for these patternsHow does this company use capital?
OCF is at or above net income for the most recent year; gross profit increased across the last 4 year-over-year transitions; EBIT margin is above the company's historical median while recent sales growth is below baseline (industry-benchmarked composite).
Three observations co-occur: the weighted composite of net cash relative to market cap, OCF/revenue, operating margin, and ROE is in its elevated range; OCF/NI is in its elevated range; total cash at MRQ is at least equal to total debt. The configuration describes capital structure, cash-flow backing, and net-cash position at the current snapshot.
Three observations co-occur: the weighted composite of net cash relative to market cap, OCF/revenue, operating margin, and ROE is in its elevated range; revenue increased every year for three years; net income was positive every year for three years. The configuration describes a present-state combination of capital structure, cash generation, profitability, and top-line growth.
Three observations align: revenue has increased every year over the trailing three years, receivables have increased every year over the trailing four years, and operating cash flow margin is on the industry-benchmarked scale. The picture is concurrent growth in revenue and receivables with peer-relative cash-conversion context.
Is this company growing?
Three multi-year observations co-occur: revenue increased year-over-year in each of the last three fiscal years, gross profit (absolute level) increased year-over-year in each of the last four fiscal years, and net income was positive in each of the last five fiscal years. The configuration describes growth-and-profitability persistence across three different windows.
An interpretation is present only while every observation it reads stays fired (score ≥ 70). It describes what the aligned readings show — never a verdict, never a prediction.
Shared structure with peers — never a ranking.
Structural observations derived from financial data, industry benchmarks, and supply chain position.
Companies that share the same coordination system — how they create, deliver, or capture value.
Companies that share active interpretations — structural patterns currently present in both stocks.
CompanyGraph