Sells retail makeup in China built on three decades of film-set color expertise by makeup artist Mao Geping.
At a glance
- Depends onUpstream position: supplies 5 industries, depends on 0
- ScaleMarket cap is above the global median
Sells retail makeup in China built on three decades of film-set color expertise by makeup artist Mao Geping.
What this company is and how it runs — written from structure, not news.
Mao Geping Cosmetics sells retail makeup built on three decades of pigment work that founder Mao Geping did formulating color cosmetics for Chinese film and television actors under studio lighting — conditions that required exact control over how color behaves on East Asian skin tones in ways that general-market products were never designed for. Every consumer product is a translation of a film-set formulation that Mao Geping has personally validated, so the professional credibility that separates the brand from other domestic labels runs directly through him rather than through an anonymous R&D team. That authentication cannot be delegated — handing sign-off to someone else severs the link from film-set expertise to retail product — which means the rate of new launches is capped by how many formulations one person can review, no matter how large the company grows. If Mao Geping's standing in China's entertainment industry were damaged by a reputational, health, or regulatory event, the entire validation chain would break, and the brand's pigment claims would become indistinguishable from any other domestic cosmetics label.
How does this company make money?
The company earns money each time a cosmetics product is sold. Sales happen through department stores, specialty beauty retailers, and e-commerce platforms inside China. There is no licensing income or service revenue — money comes in product by product, unit by unit.
What makes this company hard to replace?
Professional makeup artists who use the brand on set have already matched its specific colors to their work — switching to another brand means re-doing that color matching and relearning application techniques. Chinese consumers who have bought into the brand associate its specific color formulations with Mao Geping's artistic signature, so a generic substitute does not feel equivalent. Retailers also face friction: building the brand recognition and sales track record needed to bring in a replacement takes years.
What limits this company?
Every new product has to be approved by Mao Geping personally. That step cannot be handed off to someone else without breaking the connection between the product and his film-set credentials. So the company can only launch new products as fast as one person can review them.
What does this company depend on?
The company cannot run without specialty color pigments suited to film-grade makeup formulations, Chinese domestic manufacturing facilities that produce the cosmetics, retail distribution partnerships inside China's beauty market, Mao Geping's continued involvement in validating each product, and a professional makeup artist network that tests products and reinforces their credibility.
Who depends on this company?
Chinese professional makeup artists working in television and film depend on the brand's color accuracy for production work. Chinese consumers looking for cosmetics formulated with East Asian skin tones in mind rely on it as one of few options built around that specific need. Beauty retailers in China use the brand's professional reputation to stand out from international cosmetics companies — if the brand disappeared, they would lose a rare domestically credentialed alternative.
How does this company scale?
Once a color formulation is established and recognized, that knowledge can be extended across new product lines without starting from scratch. Brand recognition also carries over to new products at low cost. What does not scale is Mao Geping's personal review — every new product still requires his sign-off, and that step stays slow no matter how large the company grows.
What external forces can significantly affect this company?
Chinese government regulations on cosmetics ingredients and on how much space foreign brands can take in the market shape who the company is competing against. At the same time, rising Chinese consumer preference for domestic brands works in the company's favor. A counterforce is the demographic shift toward younger Chinese consumers, who may trust social media influencers more than they trust traditional makeup artistry credentials like Mao Geping's.
Where is this company structurally vulnerable?
If Mao Geping's standing in China's film and entertainment industry were damaged — by a health event, a public scandal, or a regulatory action affecting his public profile — the link between each product and its professional film-set origin would snap. Without that link, the brand's products would be indistinguishable from any other domestic cosmetics label.
Price is read as structure — trend, levels, range, peak and volatility drawn on the chart. It does not predict where price goes next.
Sign in to view price data.
Sign inWhat the company actually pays, and whether its own cash supports it.
Screen for dividend patterns
Find other stocks with similar dividend characteristics in the screener.
The reported statements, read against the company's own industry.
16 interpretations currently present — each is a set of fired observations whose alignment reads as one structural pattern. Click an observation to see the numbers behind it.
Screen for these patternsIs this company financially stable?
Two cash observations have aligned: the cash ratio (cash divided by current liabilities) is in the upper industry-benchmarked range, and cash represents a meaningful share of total assets.
Three observations have aligned: most-recent-quarter total cash equals or exceeds most-recent-quarter total debt, EBITDA-to-total-liabilities is in the upper portion of its mapped range, and FCF-to-total-liabilities is in the upper portion of its mapped range.
Three liquidity ratios co-occur in their elevated ranges: current ratio (industry-benchmarked), quick ratio, and cash ratio. The simultaneous firing means coverage is elevated through progressively more liquid asset layers, not concentrated in inventory or receivables.
Three balance-sheet observations co-occur: industry-benchmarked current ratio elevated, industry-benchmarked equity ratio elevated, and total cash at MRQ at least equal to total debt. The configuration describes equity-heavy capital structure with cash covering total debt.
How does this company use capital?
Three observations describe the configuration: operating income margin is elevated, capex intensity (capex / operating cash flow, industry-benchmarked) is high, and EBIT-to-EBITDA is high (small D&A gap). This pattern is consistent with a growing asset base, an asset-light operating profile, or current-period cost capitalization.
Three cash-flow ratios have aligned: trailing twelve-month operating cash margin is in the upper industry-benchmarked range, free cash flow as a share of operating cash flow is in the upper industry-benchmarked range (meaning capex is a small share of operating cash), and annual operating cash flow divided by sales is high on its own scale.
Three FCF-denominator ratios co-occur in their elevated ranges: FCF/Total_assets, FCF/Total_shareholders_equity, and industry-benchmarked FCF/OCF. The configuration describes free cash flow scaling against three different denominators at the latest annual snapshot.
Three margin observations have aligned: industry-benchmarked gross profit margin is in the upper peer range, operating income margin is in the upper portion of its mapped range, and industry-benchmarked TTM operating cash flow margin is in the upper peer range.
Three observations describe the present configuration: operating income increased year-over-year in each of the last four fiscal years, the 6-year revenue CAGR is positive, and revenue increased year-over-year in each of the last five fiscal years. None of the three observations divides by revenue.
Three margin observations have aligned: industry-benchmarked gross profit margin is in the upper peer range, operating income margin is in the upper portion of its mapped range, and industry-benchmarked net profit margin is in the upper peer range.
Four observations co-occur: free cash flow positive each of the last three fiscal years, revenue increased each of the last three fiscal years, trailing-statistics OCF margin elevated, and book value increased each of the last four fiscal years. The configuration describes multi-year fundamental persistence across cash flow, top line, margin, and equity accumulation.
Three observations align: revenue has increased every year over the trailing three years, receivables have increased every year over the trailing four years, and operating cash flow margin is on the industry-benchmarked scale. The picture is concurrent growth in revenue and receivables with peer-relative cash-conversion context.
Is this company growing?
Three profitability lines have aligned at positive 4-year CAGR: net income growth, gross profit growth, and free cash flow growth. Together they describe consistent compound growth across the income statement and cash flow statement.
Three growth observations align: net income CAGR over the trailing 6 years is positive, revenue CAGR over the trailing 6 years is positive, and a growth-consistency composite reads high. Together they describe a multi-year compound-growth pattern.
Three multi-year observations co-occur: revenue increased year-over-year in each of the last three fiscal years, gross profit (absolute level) increased year-over-year in each of the last four fiscal years, and net income was positive in each of the last five fiscal years. The configuration describes growth-and-profitability persistence across three different windows.
Three growth observations align: free cash flow has grown on a 4-year compound basis, gross profit has grown on a 4-year compound basis, and revenue has increased every year across the trailing three years. Together they describe concurrent growth across revenue, profitability, and cash generation.
An interpretation is present only while every observation it reads stays fired (score ≥ 70). It describes what the aligned readings show — never a verdict, never a prediction.
Shared structure with peers — never a ranking.
Structural observations derived from financial data, industry benchmarks, and supply chain position.
Companies that share the same coordination system — how they create, deliver, or capture value.
Companies that share active interpretations — structural patterns currently present in both stocks.
CompanyGraph