Vend Marketplaces ASA
VEND · Oslo Børs · Norway
Price data from its 0R9I listing on LSE
schibsted.comFinancials as of FY2025
Runs a cluster of dominant online marketplaces across Nordic countries, earning mainly from fees sellers and advertisers pay for listings and visibility rather than from the value of goods exchanged.
- Depends onUpstream position: supplies 5 industries, depends on 3
- ScaleMarket cap is $6.63B, above the global median of $1.18B
- PositionGross margin is 91.5%, higher than 95% of its Publishing peers (median 37.8%)
What this company is and how it runs — written from structure, not news.
It sits between sellers and buyers of vehicles, property and general goods, and separately between employers and job candidates, coordinating their discovery of one another, their communication, secure payment and sometimes shipping. It also gathers the attention of everyone using its marketplaces and sells that on as advertising space.
It earns mainly from fees that sellers and professional customers pay to list vehicles, property, jobs or goods and to gain premium placement, together with transaction-linked charges such as payment handling, insurance and shipping, and from advertising sold against the traffic its marketplaces attract. This revenue is spread across several distinct sectors rather than concentrated in one, with vehicle-related listings appearing to be the largest single contributor.
Its scale rests on being the largest or leading named marketplace in most of the national markets and product categories it serves, a position built on accumulated brand recognition and user habit rather than owned physical infrastructure. CompanyGraph's classification places it among a very small number of companies worldwide running this same brand-led marketplace model, and the years on file show the link between operating profitability and bottom-line profit has not always been stable, which qualifies any simple reading of scale converting smoothly into profit.
It depends on outside sellers, landlords, employers and advertisers to keep supplying the listings that make its marketplaces worth visiting, and on external data centres and technology providers to keep the platforms running, which the company names as its main supply-chain risk. It also draws on more ordinary inputs such as office space, IT equipment, consultants and electricity, and CompanyGraph's mapping of industry-level dependencies places it as relying on a small number of other industries for inputs, consistent with this account.
A broad mix of professional customers, including car dealers, real-estate agents, recruiters and advertisers, and a very large number of individual consumers buying, selling, renting or job-hunting, rely on its marketplaces to reach one another. CompanyGraph also places it in a downstream position supplying several other industries.
Company filings describe its combination of strong local brand recognition, established customer relationships, accumulated proprietary transaction data and deep familiarity with each national market as not easily replicated, singling out its data advantage as hard for large general-purpose technology platforms to match. Separately, CompanyGraph finds only a handful of companies anywhere running this same kind of brand-led marketplace structure, which places it in an uncommon position rather than a crowded one.
The company's own account describes listing and premium-product contracts lasting only a matter of weeks and general customer contracts of a year or less, a short commitment period rather than a long one. On this evidence, whatever keeps sellers and buyers returning is unlikely to be contractual lock-in itself, and more likely rests on habit, brand recognition or the concentration of other users already on the same marketplace, though CompanyGraph does not have separate evidence measuring that effect.
The industry pattern CompanyGraph tests here expects growth to be bound by the need to keep a brand relevant and trusted enough that people default to it. The company's own risk disclosures point in a related direction, naming competition and disruption from new technologies and business models, including generative AI, as the pressure it discusses first, ahead of its exposure to swings in unemployment, real-estate activity, consumer confidence and general economic growth in the markets it serves.
Its own filings point to the stability of external data centres and technology providers as the main point of supply-chain fragility, since technology is described as central to running the marketplaces and cyber threats are named as an ongoing concern. The company also states that patents and licenses play a limited role in protecting its position, so its advantage rests on brand strength, accumulated data and customer relationships rather than legal exclusivity, against a backdrop where new technologies and business models, including generative AI, are named as its foremost risk.
The company names generative AI and new competing technologies and business models as the competitive pressure it discusses first, ahead of its sensitivity to unemployment, real-estate prices, consumer confidence and broader economic growth in the markets where it operates. It also operates under European digital-services, data-protection and cybersecurity-related regulation and national financial supervision, and carries currency exposure from operating outside its home market.
Read from the company's own filings and public materials (gathered August 2026) together with figures CompanyGraph recomputed from its statements. Written September 2026. A question with no evidence behind it is left out rather than answered.
Sign in to view price data.
Sign inWhat the company actually pays, and whether its own cash supports it.
The reported statements, read against the company's own industry.
Shared structure with peers — never a ranking.
Structural observations derived from financial data, industry benchmarks, and supply chain position.
Peer Positioning
Structural Tensions
Financial Health
Supply Chain
Scale
Companies that share the same coordination system — how they create, deliver, or capture value.