Robert Arnott

Challenging cap-weighted indexing by weighting stocks on economic fundamentals

Who He Is

Robert Arnott is the founder and chairman of Research Affiliates, a firm that pioneered fundamental indexing as an alternative to traditional market-cap weighted indices. He has written extensively on asset allocation, factor investing, and contrarian strategies.

Arnott challenges conventional investment wisdom. He questions assumptions most investors take for granted and uses data to test whether common beliefs actually hold.

He is both a practitioner and a researcher, bridging academic finance and real-world investing. His work appears in peer-reviewed journals and guides billions of dollars in investment strategies.

Core Investment Philosophy

Arnott believes market-cap weighted indices have fundamental flaws. They overweight overvalued stocks and underweight undervalued ones by design. Fundamental indexing—weighting by economic footprint rather than price—addresses this.

He is a contrarian at heart. He looks for opportunities where consensus expectations are wrong. Popular investments tend to be overpriced; unloved ones tend to offer better value.

Valuation matters enormously. Starting valuations predict long-term returns more reliably than most realize. Buying expensive assets leads to poor outcomes regardless of quality.

He applies quantitative rigor to investment questions. Data and evidence, not stories and intuition, should drive decisions. Testing ideas against historical evidence reveals what actually works.

Patterns He Focuses On

• Fundamental Weighting — Arnott's indices weight stocks by measures like sales, cash flow, dividends, and book value rather than market capitalization. This systematically tilts toward value.
• Mean Reversion — Valuations tend to return to historical norms over time. Expensive markets become less expensive; cheap markets become less cheap. This drives contrarian opportunities.
• Factor Investing — He studies how characteristics like value, momentum, quality, and size affect returns. Understanding these factors helps explain why some strategies work.
• Contrarian Observations — When everyone agrees on something, the opposite often proves correct. Consensus expectations are frequently wrong because they are already priced in.
• Yield and Income — Dividends and interest provide tangible returns independent of price appreciation. Arnott values income-producing investments.
• Global Opportunities — He looks beyond domestic markets for value. When one country is expensive, others may be cheap. Geographic diversification adds return sources.

Example Companies

RAFI Indices — Research Affiliates' fundamental indices hold diversified portfolios of stocks weighted by economic fundamentals. The approach is systematic rather than focused on individual company selection.

Emerging Markets — Arnott has advocated for emerging market exposure when developed markets were expensive. His contrarian view looks for value where others see risk.

Limitations and Criticisms

Fundamental indexing has underperformed market-cap weighting in recent periods dominated by growth stocks. Value tilts can lag for extended periods, testing investor patience.

Arnott's contrarian calls have sometimes been early, which is painful. Being early looks identical to being wrong until the thesis plays out.

Quantitative approaches can miss qualitative factors. Data captures the past but may not predict structural changes in business models or industries.

His strategies are factor-based and subject to crowding. As more investors adopt similar approaches, the edge may diminish.

What Modern Investors Can Learn

• Question conventional wisdom — Common beliefs may be wrong. Test assumptions with evidence.
• Consider alternatives to market-cap weighting — Traditional indices have structural biases. Fundamental weighting offers a different approach.
• Respect valuation — Starting prices predict returns more than most realize. Buying expensive assets rarely works well.
• Be willing to be contrarian — Popular investments are often overpriced. Unloved ones may offer better value.
• Use data over intuition — Evidence should drive decisions. What feels right is not always what works.

Inside CompanyGraph

View this perspective inside CompanyGraph.