How to Find Quality Stocks at a Reasonable Price

March 17, 2026

How to use the screener to find companies where durable business quality meets reasonable valuation — the cross-dimensional screen investors ask about most.

The Question

How do I find high-quality businesses that aren't overpriced? This is perhaps the most asked question in investing, and for good reason — quality and value pull in opposite directions. Companies with strong earnings quality, reliable cash flows, and consistent growth tend to command premium valuations. Companies trading at statistical discounts often have quality problems that justify the low price. Finding both quality and value together is structurally unusual, which is precisely what makes it worth screening for.

The screener's individual articles on business quality and value characteristics each cover one dimension in depth. This article covers the intersection — what happens when you combine quality and value interpretations in a single screen, and what the resulting companies structurally look like.

Why This Combination Is Different

Screening for quality alone tells you the business operates well. Screening for value alone tells you the market price is low relative to measurable characteristics. Neither answers the question investors actually have: "Is this good business available at a price that doesn't fully reflect its quality?"

The tension between quality and value is structural. Markets generally price quality at a premium — investors are willing to pay more for reliable earnings, strong cash flows, and consistent growth. When a high-quality company also shows value characteristics, it means the market is either skeptical about the quality's persistence, reacting to a temporary setback, or simply has not recognized the quality pattern. Each of these explanations has different implications, and the screen cannot tell you which applies — but identifying the structural overlap is the necessary first step.

This cross-dimensional approach also guards against common single-dimension failures. Pure quality screens can lead you to excellent businesses at terrible prices. Pure value screens can lead you to cheap businesses that deserve to be cheap. The intersection filters both failure modes simultaneously.

Key Observations

Earnings Quality

What it measures: The degree to which reported earnings are supported by actual cash generation rather than accounting accruals. In the QARP context, this observation ensures the quality side of the equation is based on real economic performance, not accounting artifacts.

Data source: Derived from the relationship between net income and operating cash flow, adjusted for accrual intensity.

Cash Flow Margin

What it measures: Operating cash flow as a proportion of revenue. In the QARP context, this confirms the business model naturally converts activity into cash — a quality characteristic that is difficult to fabricate and important for sustaining operations through valuation cycles.

Data source: Operating cash flow from the cash flow statement divided by total revenue.

Graham Number

What it measures: A valuation benchmark combining earnings per share and book value per share into a single fair value estimate. In the QARP context, the Graham Number provides the value anchor — when a quality company trades below this benchmark, the combination of quality and value is structurally present.

Data source: Calculated from earnings per share and book value per share using the Graham formula.

Valuation Compression

What it measures: Whether the company's valuation multiples have contracted over time. In the QARP context, valuation compression in a quality company may indicate a temporary market re-rating that creates the quality-value overlap. But it can also indicate justified skepticism about quality persistence — the exclusion filter below helps distinguish these cases.

Data source: Historical valuation multiples compared to current levels.

Interpretations That Emerge

Quality Compounder + Graham Value Position

Constituent observations: Earnings Quality, Growth Consistency, Cash Flow Margin (quality side) + Graham Number, Earnings Quality, Equity Ratio (value side)

What emerges: The most direct QARP screen. Companies passing both interpretations simultaneously show consistent quality metrics — reliable earnings, steady growth, strong cash conversion — while also trading below the Graham valuation benchmark with manageable leverage. The overlap of Earnings Quality in both interpretations means this observation is doubly validated, providing high confidence that the reported numbers are economically real.

Limits: The Graham Number is a simplified valuation model. Quality companies may correctly trade above their Graham Number due to growth prospects or intangible assets. This combination will miss high-quality companies that are reasonably priced but not statistically cheap by the Graham framework.

Earnings Integrity + Deep Value Position

Constituent observations: Earnings Quality, Free Cash Flow Conversion, Accrual Intensity (integrity side) + Below Book Value (legacy typeKey 'asset-play'), Current Ratio, Equity Ratio (value side)

What emerges: A more conservative QARP variant. Instead of screening for quality as a positive attribute, this combination verifies that earnings are trustworthy (integrity) and then looks for deep asset-based value. Companies passing both interpretations have reliable financial statements and trade below their tangible asset value — the most structurally extreme form of quality-at-value.

Limits: Deep value positions are often found in asset-heavy businesses (manufacturing, real estate, natural resources). This combination may systematically favor certain industry types over asset-light businesses where quality manifests differently.

Cash Generation Engine + Retained Earnings on the Balance Sheet

Constituent observations: Cash Flow Margin, Free Cash Flow Conversion, Operating Cash Flow to Sales (cash side) + Retained Earnings Weight, Profitable All Years (5y), Equity Ratio (value side)

What emerges: A cash-focused QARP screen. Companies that are strong cash generators whose balance sheet has been built through sustained profitability and accumulated retained profits, with contained leverage. The quality dimension is measured through cash generation rather than earnings or growth — a more conservative proxy that is harder to manipulate through accounting choices. The value dimension is balance-sheet composition supported by a five-year profitability history: retained-earnings weight, evidence the earnings were actually made, and an equity-funded asset base.

Limits: The retained-earnings side does not detect hidden, unrecognized, or off-balance-sheet asset value. It identifies a balance-sheet history of profit retention. The combination flags companies where strong cash generation today coincides with a long history of profitable retention — not where assets are mispriced.

Valuation Compression Risk (Exclusion Filter)

Constituent observations: Valuation Compression, Earnings Reversion Risk, Growth Consistency

What emerges: This interpretation serves as a critical exclusion filter for any QARP screen. When valuation compression coincides with earnings reversion risk and inconsistent growth, the apparent value may be justified market skepticism rather than opportunity. Excluding companies that trigger this interpretation from your QARP results filters out the most likely value traps — situations where cheapness reflects legitimate concerns about quality deterioration.

Limits: Some companies triggering valuation compression risk will turn out to be genuine opportunities where the market overreacted. The exclusion improves the average quality of results but may filter out contrarian situations with favorable outcomes.

Using the Screener

The Standard QARP Screen

Select Quality Compounder and Graham Value Position simultaneously. This is the most direct implementation of quality at a reasonable price — it requires both operational quality and statistical value to be structurally present. Then exclude Valuation Compression Risk to remove companies where the value appearance may be a justified re-rating rather than an opportunity.

If the result set is too narrow, relax the value side by removing Graham Value Position and running the Quality Compounder results against Deep Value Position in a separate screen. Compare the overlap — companies appearing in both represent the broadest QARP universe.

The Conservative QARP Screen

For a more defensive approach, start with Earnings Integrity rather than Quality Compounder. Earnings Integrity is a narrower quality filter focused on the reliability of reported numbers rather than the attractiveness of the business characteristics. Combine with Deep Value Position for the most conservative quality-and-value intersection — companies with trustworthy financials trading below asset value.

Add Balance Sheet Fortress as a third filter to ensure financial strength. This produces a very selective screen — high-integrity earnings, deep asset value, and strong balance sheet — that prioritizes safety across all dimensions.

Boundaries

What This Cannot Tell You

The QARP intersection describes a structural condition — quality metrics and value metrics are simultaneously present. It does not explain why the overlap exists. The quality may be temporary (the business is losing its competitive position). The value may be warranted (the market correctly perceives risks not captured by quantitative observations). The combination may be coincidental (the market hasn't updated after recent positive developments).

Cross-dimensional screens also cannot account for the durability of either dimension. Quality can erode and value can deepen. A company that today shows quality at a reasonable price may tomorrow show deteriorating quality at an even cheaper price. The screen captures a snapshot, not a trajectory.

Finally, the QARP screen shares the limits of its component interpretations. Quality observations are derived from financial statements. Value observations are sensitive to the valuation framework used. Both dimensions are backward-looking measurements applied to forward-looking investment decisions. The screen narrows the universe to structurally interesting companies — the investment decision itself requires judgment that no screen can provide.