CompanyGraph
Runs both UFC and WWE to sell two types of fight content that no other company can legally offer together.
- Depends onMidstream position: 4 outgoing, 5 incoming connections
- ScaleMarket cap is higher than 95% of all stocks globally
- FinancialsAltman Z-Score: safe zone
- Interpretations5 currently firing — 1 · 4
What this company is and how it runs — written from structure, not news.
TKO Group Holdings controls two live content pipelines — UFC's sanctioned athletic bouts and WWE's scripted wrestling entertainment — and sells the rights to both to the two largest sports media buyers in North America, ESPN and NBC Universal. The two pipelines exist under opposite legal classifications: UFC bouts must have unscripted outcomes to keep their state athletic commission licences valid, while WWE's predetermined results are protected precisely because they are classified as entertainment rather than sport, exempting them from the same oversight. Because UFC champions can only compete two or three times a year before medical recovery requirements kick in, the number of premium pay-per-view events TKO can stage is capped by physiology and regulation rather than by investment or demand, and WWE's weekly scripted programming fills that gap in a way no single rival can replicate. The whole structure depends on keeping the two properties legally separate — if any athletic commission found evidence that UFC bouts were being coordinated with WWE storyline teams, the sanctioned-sport classification that gives ESPN's rights deal its value would be revoked, and the arrangement that makes holding both pipelines simultaneously possible would collapse.
How does this company make money?
TKO charges $70 or more per UFC pay-per-view event and collects monthly fees from WWE Network subscribers. ESPN and NBC Universal pay ongoing licensing fees for the right to broadcast UFC and WWE content. Fans buying tickets to live events add another layer of revenue. On top of that, TKO earns money when its fighters' and wrestlers' names and likenesses appear on merchandise through consumer product licensing deals.
What makes this company hard to replace?
UFC fighters sign exclusive multi-year contracts, so a fan who wants to watch a specific fighter has no legal alternative promotion to turn to. WWE storylines run across years, and replacing a performer mid-arc disrupts the ongoing narrative in ways that are hard to recover from, which keeps audiences tied to the current roster. ESPN and NBC Universal are locked into long-term media rights deals that give competitors no way to access those distribution channels for comparable content.
What limits this company?
State athletic commission rules require UFC champions to rest between sanctioned bouts, limiting each fighter to 2-3 performances per year. That directly caps the number of pay-per-view events that can charge $70 or more. No amount of investment changes this — the ceiling is set by physiology and regulation, not by how many arenas TKO can book or how much it spends on production.
What does this company depend on?
TKO cannot operate without state athletic commission licences that allow UFC events to be held as sanctioned athletic contests. It also depends on its ESPN media rights agreement to distribute UFC content, on NBC Universal to carry WWE programming on USA Network and Peacock, on UFC octagon and WWE ring venue infrastructure to stage live events, and on the UFC FIGHT PASS streaming platform to deliver content directly to subscribers.
Who depends on this company?
ESPN relies on UFC programming to keep subscribers paying for ESPN+. NBC Universal's USA Network and Peacock rely on WWE shows to anchor their weekly television ratings. Live venue operators like T-Mobile Arena depend on guaranteed sellout UFC and WWE events to subsidize the rest of their booking calendar. Pay-per-view distributors depend on UFC fights as the premium content that justifies $70+ price points — without it, that segment of their business loses its anchor.
How does this company scale?
Past UFC fights and WWE matches can be packaged and streamed or syndicated at almost no additional cost, so the content library grows in value without much new spending. What cannot scale is live performance: individual fighters are limited by training time and physical recovery, so the number of premium live events stays fixed no matter how much capital TKO puts in.
What external forces can significantly affect this company?
State athletic commissions can change fighter safety requirements or tighten event licensing rules at any time, directly affecting how many UFC events can be held and under what conditions. Cord-cutting is shrinking the traditional cable and pay-per-view audience that has historically been TKO's largest revenue base. International regulatory restrictions on combat sports broadcasting — particularly in markets like China — limit how far TKO can expand globally.
Where is this company structurally vulnerable?
If a state athletic commission found that UFC bouts had been coordinated with WWE's storyline teams — or if regulators legally reclassified predetermined combat entertainment as fraudulent athletic competition — UFC's sanctioned-sport licences would be revoked. That would collapse the championship ranking system ESPN's rights agreement depends on, and it would destroy the legal separation that allows TKO to hold both properties at the same time.
Price is read as structure — trend, levels, range, peak and volatility drawn on the chart. It does not predict where price goes next.
Sign in to view price data.
Sign inWhat the company actually pays, and whether its own cash supports it.
Screen for this company's dividend patterns
Find other companies where the same dividend readings fire.
1 interpretation currently present — each is a set of fired observations whose alignment reads as one structural pattern. Click an observation to see the numbers behind it.
Screen for these patternsHow does this company return capital?
High Dividend Payout With FCF And Equity Ratio
Three observations co-occur: dividend payments are large relative to net income (high payout ratio), free cash flow has been positive each of the last three years, and the industry-benchmarked equity ratio is elevated. The high payout ratio happens alongside multi-year FCF positivity and equity-heavy capital structure.
An interpretation is present only while every observation it reads stays fired (score ≥ 70). It describes what the aligned readings show — never a verdict, never a prediction.
The reported statements, read against the company's own industry.
4 interpretations currently present — each is a set of fired observations whose alignment reads as one structural pattern. Click an observation to see the numbers behind it.
Screen for these patternsIs this company financially stable?
Goodwill-Heavy Equity
Equity position looks solid, but the composition deserves a look. Equity ratio is elevated for its industry while goodwill is a large share of total assets and large relative to shareholders equity. The equity cushion sits substantially on acquisition-premium book value rather than on retained earnings or paid-in capital.
Is this company growing?
Multi-Year Revenue And Profit Growth
Three growth observations align: net income CAGR over the trailing 6 years is positive, revenue CAGR over the trailing 6 years is positive, and a growth-consistency composite reads high. Together they describe a multi-year compound-growth pattern.
Multi-Year Revenue, Profit, And Income Growth
Three multi-year observations co-occur: revenue increased year-over-year in each of the last three fiscal years, gross profit (absolute level) increased year-over-year in each of the last four fiscal years, and net income was positive in each of the last five fiscal years. The configuration describes growth-and-profitability persistence across three different windows.
How is this stock valued?
Close Below 40W SMA With Profitability
Three observations describe the present configuration: the current close sits below the 40-week SMA (the conventional 'below 200-day SMA'), the company has reported positive net income in each of the last three annual periods, and operating cash flow exceeded net income in the most recent annual period.
An interpretation is present only while every observation it reads stays fired (score ≥ 70). It describes what the aligned readings show — never a verdict, never a prediction.
Shared structure with peers — never a ranking.
Structural observations derived from financial data, industry benchmarks, and supply chain position.
Structural Tensions
Financial Health
Supply Chain
Scale
Companies that share the same coordination system — how they create, deliver, or capture value.
Companies that share active interpretations — structural patterns currently present in both stocks.