Runs auction and online marketplaces that match owners looking to dispose of used, damaged or surplus vehicles and equipment with buyers, taking a fee on most of the transactions it facilitates.
- Depends onUpstream position: supplies 6 industries, depends on 0
- ScaleMarket cap is $16B, above the global median of $1.18B
- FinancialsAltman Z-Score 2.32: grey zone
- Interpretations5 currently firing — 5
What this company is and how it runs — written from structure, not news.
The system brings together sellers releasing used, damaged or surplus vehicles and equipment with buyers seeking to acquire them, meeting at physical sites and online marketplaces. Its own filings describe what happens between intake and sale: inspecting and testing, photographing and reporting, marketing, running the auction or listing, handling title transfer, and collecting and paying out proceeds. CompanyGraph's mapping of which industries feed into which places this company upstream of several others, meaning what it redistributes becomes an input elsewhere.
The company's own filings describe most of its revenue as fee income: commissions charged to sellers and transaction and administrative fees charged to buyers on assets it never owns, plus smaller fees for optional marketplace services. They describe a separate, substantial stream from buying assets outright and reselling them, where the full resale price is booked as revenue rather than just a fee, so part of the business carries price and inventory risk that the fee-based part does not. Separately, receivables, inventory and amounts owed to suppliers all turn over quickly relative to cost of goods sold in CompanyGraph's recomputed figures, consistent with value moving through the business rather than sitting in it.
This company scales the way a small number of other businesses in the same category do, by adding more physical sites and more marketplace listings rather than by growing the volume of one product. Its own filings describe different kinds of unit being added at once: physical auction, storage and administrative sites, which each require land, permits and staff, and online marketplaces and listing platforms, which add capacity with less physical build-out, alongside a stated effort to bring its separate platforms together into one. What CompanyGraph holds does not include margin or return figures to say how profitably each additional site or listing scales, and no market-cap figures for that peer group are on file to compare relative size.
The company's own filings name a steady inflow of damaged, total-loss and low-value vehicles from insurance companies, used-vehicle dealers, rental and fleet-lease companies and auto lenders as a central input the marketplace runs on. They also name reliance on independent trucking and haulage operators to move vehicles, and on outside cloud, data-center and online-bidding infrastructure to run the marketplace itself. Separately, CompanyGraph's own mapping of which industries feed into this one does not register a formal upstream dependency, a narrower and differently defined measure than the company's own account of its suppliers.
In CompanyGraph's mapping of which industries feed into which, this company sits upstream of several others, meaning what it redistributes becomes an input to their activity. Its own filings describe separate customer groups on each side of the marketplace: sellers, including insurance companies, dealers, fleet owners and equipment manufacturers, and buyers, including body shops, rebuilders, used-vehicle dealers, wholesalers, exporters, dismantlers, recyclers and brokers, alongside the general public. No single customer's share of revenue is disclosed in what CompanyGraph holds, so how concentrated this dependence is cannot be said.
RB Global's own account of its position names a global platform, long-standing local customer relationships, data and insights, physical yard capacity, a global buyer base and its brand names as what it considers its advantages, but this is the company's own description of itself, not something CompanyGraph has independently confirmed. CompanyGraph also groups only a small number of other companies with this one, businesses built and scaling the same way. Neither of these supports a claim about which of these features, if any, a rival could not reproduce.
CompanyGraph's general expectation for a business that grows by replicating a standard unit is that expansion is limited by each new site or unit paying for itself on its own, a starting expectation to test against the company rather than a measurement of it. The company's own filings point to more specific limits: available site capacity, the difficulty of acquiring suitable land, and local zoning and permitting rules that can slow the addition of new sites, together with its ability to attract and keep skilled staff. It also frames itself as limited on more than one side at once, needing both a steady supply of vehicles to sell and steady buyer demand for them.
The company's own filings identify the loss of significant suppliers or a drop in the volume of vehicles they provide, and a failure to meet buyer demand and expectations, as the first risks in its own summary, ahead of competitive entrants and shortfalls in site capacity. It also names reliance on independent haulage operators to move vehicles, and on outside cloud, data-center and online-bidding infrastructure to run the marketplace itself, as dependencies it flags as a risk to its own operations if disrupted.
The company's own filings name several outside forces acting on it: state and local vehicle-title and motor-vehicle regulators, and transport regulators for some vehicles moved to market; export-control and economic-sanctions regimes across the jurisdictions it operates in, which it says could reduce participation by international bidders and sellers if trade restrictions or tariffs tighten; and currency movements, since a meaningful share of its revenue and costs is earned outside the US dollar. It also discloses an unresolved dispute with a foreign tax authority over whether a subsidiary should have been treated as resident there in past years, an open proceeding rather than a settled matter.
Read from the company's own filings and public materials (gathered August 2026) together with figures CompanyGraph recomputed from its statements. Written August 2026. A question with no evidence behind it is left out rather than answered.
Sign in to view price data.
Sign inWhat the company actually pays, and whether its own cash supports it.
The reported statements, read against the company's own industry.
5 interpretations currently present — each is a set of fired observations whose alignment reads as one structural pattern. Click an observation to see the numbers behind it.
Screen for these patternsHow does this company use capital?
Three Turnover Ratios Elevated
Collects fast, clears inventory fast, and pays suppliers fast too.
Is this company growing?
Multi-Year Revenue And Profit Growth
Revenue and earnings have both grown steadily across six years.
Multi-Year Revenue, Profit, And Income Growth
Revenue has risen in each of three years, gross profit in each of four, and it has made a profit in all five.
How is this stock valued?
Close Below 40W SMA With Profitability
The price sits below its 40-week average, on three profitable years and cash above profit.
Price Below Mean With Profitability And Book Value
Price sits well below its yearly mean, on three profitable years and rising book value.
An interpretation is present only while every observation it reads stays fired (score ≥ 70). It describes what the aligned readings show — never a verdict, never a prediction.
Shared structure with peers — never a ranking.
Structural observations derived from financial data, industry benchmarks, and supply chain position.
Financial Health
Supply Chain
Scale
Companies that share the same coordination system — how they create, deliver, or capture value.
Companies that share active interpretations — structural patterns currently present in both stocks.