Runs four separate U.S. options exchanges under one owner so the same contracts trade with different fee structures on each.
At a glance
Depends onDownstream position: depends on 23 industries, supplies 4
Scale
Market cap is above the global median
FinancialsAltman Z-Score: safe zone
Interpretations1 currently firing — 1
What this company is and how it runs — written from structure, not news.
Nature view
Miami International Holdings owns four separately registered U.S. options exchanges — MIAX, MIAX Pearl, MIAX Emerald, and MIAX Sapphire — and because each registration carries its own maker-taker fee schedule, the same options contract trades simultaneously across four venues at four different rebate rates. Market makers have built proprietary algorithms to exploit those fee differences, and broker-dealers maintain separate connectivity to each venue, so the volume flowing through the platform is attracted not by better prices but by the rebate arbitrage the four-registration structure makes available. That structure is the one thing a competitor cannot copy by launching a single new exchange, since a single registration produces only one fee tier and no cross-venue arbitrage to attract market-maker demand. The same feature that cannot be replicated is also the one most exposed to regulatory risk: if the SEC required common-ownership operators to consolidate their registrations or standardize fee schedules across venues listing identical contracts, the rebate arbitrage would disappear along with the market-maker volume built around it.
How does this company make money?
The company collects a transaction fee on every options contract traded across its four U.S. exchanges, with each exchange charging its own maker-taker rate. It also earns listing fees from companies that use BSX and International Stock Exchange to list their securities. On top of that, it collects clearing and settlement fees from trades processed through MIAX Futures.
What makes this company hard to replace?
Market makers have built proprietary algorithms specifically calibrated to exploit the fee differences across the four MIAX exchanges — rewiring those systems for a different set of venues takes significant time and money. Broker-dealers have built and maintain separate connectivity and order-routing logic for each of the four exchange registrations, which is not easily transferred. International issuers listed on BSX face a lengthy delisting and re-registration process if they want to move to a different offshore exchange.
What limits this company?
Every one of the four exchanges must have its own separate capital reserve, its own board, and its own compliance team. None of that can be shared or combined. So as the company grows, those overhead costs multiply with each registration rather than shrinking — which squeezes profit margins compared to a rival running a single exchange.
What does this company depend on?
The company cannot operate without SEC exchange operator licenses for each of the four U.S. exchanges, a CFTC registration covering MIAX Futures clearing operations, Bermuda Monetary Authority approval for its BSX exchange, its proprietary electronic trading technology, and active clearing relationships with major broker-dealers.
Who depends on this company?
Market makers have built their trading algorithms around the rebate differences across the four MIAX exchanges — if those exchanges went away, that arbitrage opportunity would disappear entirely. Institutional broker-dealers depend on consistent execution across the MIAX family and would need to rebuild their order-routing systems for alternatives. Bermuda-domiciled investment funds use BSX listings to meet regulatory requirements in international markets and would face a difficult re-registration process elsewhere.
How does this company scale?
Adding more options symbols and contract months to the existing exchanges costs very little — the electronic matching engines handle extra volume without much added expense. What does not get cheaper is the regulatory side: every additional exchange registration means separate SEC oversight, a new independent board, and a duplicated compliance operation that cannot be folded into the others.
What external forces can significantly affect this company?
Changes to Bermuda's international tax treaties could make BSX less attractive to the cross-border funds that list there. SEC modifications to best execution rules could eliminate the benefit of running multiple competing exchanges under one owner. Dodd-Frank derivatives regulations expanding into options markets would raise compliance costs across all four exchange registrations at once.
Where is this company structurally vulnerable?
If the SEC passed a rule requiring companies that own multiple exchanges to consolidate them, or banned different fee schedules across venues listing the same contracts, the entire model would collapse. The rebate differences that attract market makers would disappear, and with them the trading volume that the business runs on.
Price is read as structure — trend, levels, range, peak and volatility drawn on the chart. It does not predict where price goes next.
The reported statements, read against the company's own industry.
Financials view
Market Capitalization
4.10BUSD
vs all stocks (USD)
Updated Jul 19, 2026
Trailing P/E
33.33x
vs Capital Markets peers
Updated Jul 19, 2026
Revenue (TTM)
1.41BUSD
vs all stocks (USD)
Updated Jul 19, 2026
Profit Margin
8.64%
vs Capital Markets peers
Updated Jul 19, 2026
52-Week Change
37.70%
vs all stocks
Updated Jul 19, 2026
Market Capitalization
4.10BUSD
vs all stocks (USD)
Updated Jul 19, 2026
Enterprise Value
3.44BUSD
vs all stocks (USD)
Updated Jul 19, 2026
Trailing P/E
33.33x
vs Capital Markets peers
Updated Jul 19, 2026
Gross Margin
34.78%
vs Capital Markets peers
Updated Jul 19, 2026
Profit Margin
8.64%
vs Capital Markets peers
Updated Jul 19, 2026
Operating Margin
12.43%
vs Capital Markets peers
Updated Jul 19, 2026
Shares Outstanding
94.21MSharesUpdated Jul 19, 2026
Float Shares
88.94MSharesUpdated Jul 19, 2026
Shares Short
7.59MSharesUpdated Jul 19, 2026
Short Ratio
2.55days
vs all stocks
Updated Jul 19, 2026
Short % of Shares Outstanding
52-Week Low
28.63USDUpdated Jul 19, 2026
52-Week High
57.14USDUpdated Jul 19, 2026
52-Week Change
37.70%
vs all stocks
Updated Jul 19, 2026
50-Day MA
44.26USDUpdated Jul 19, 2026
200-Day MA
43.42
1 interpretation currently present — each is a set of fired observations whose alignment reads as one structural pattern. Click an observation to see the numbers behind it.
Three observations co-occur: long-term debt decreased year-over-year in each of the last four fiscal years, total cash at MRQ is at least equal to total debt, and the industry-benchmarked equity ratio is in its elevated range. The configuration describes past LT-debt reduction consistency alongside cash-vs-debt position and equity-heavy capital structure.
Reads
An interpretation is present only while every observation it reads stays fired (score ≥ 70). It describes what the aligned readings show — never a verdict, never a prediction.
Shared structure with peers — never a ranking.
Relationships view
Structural observations derived from financial data, industry benchmarks, and supply chain position.
Financial Health
Altman Z-Score: safe zoneNotable
Altman Z-Score: 7.22
Supply Chain
Downstream position: depends on 23 industries, supplies 4Notable
Outgoing: 4.00Incoming: 23.00
High connectivity hub: 27 industry connectionsNotable
Total Connections: 27.00
Scale
Market cap is above the global medianNotable
Market cap (USD): 4,097,063,131Global Median: 1,131,585,792.619