CompanyGraph
Turns data about people and businesses into credit scores, risk analytics, and identity checks that lenders, insurers, healthcare providers, and other companies pay to use when making decisions about them.
- Depends onMidstream position: 5 outgoing, 6 incoming connections
- ScaleMarket cap is $35.59B, higher than 95% of all stocks globally
- PositionCurrent ratio is 0.85×, lower than 95% of its Consulting Services peers (median 1.55×)
- Interpretations6 currently firing — 6
What this company is and how it runs — written from structure, not news.
CompanyGraph reads this as a system that sits between the people, businesses, and records that generate underlying data, and institutions such as lenders, insurers, healthcare providers, and marketers that need to make decisions about them, converting raw records into standardized scores, reports, and analytics for those institutions while also connecting directly with individual consumers who monitor their own data through it. In this arrangement, the company appears to produce and distribute risk-relevant information rather than carry the underlying credit or insurance risk itself, which stays with the lenders and insurers that are its clients. CompanyGraph's classification places it in a middle position within its structural map, a classification-level observation rather than a measure of reliance or fragility.
CompanyGraph reads its revenue as a blend of per-transaction data and analytics fees, recurring software subscriptions, referral fees tied to its consumer-facing platform, and consulting engagements, rather than a single product line. Revenue and the receivables owed to the company have grown together across its recent multi-year record, a pattern consistent with revenue that is billed and collected after delivery rather than paid upfront. Profitability has held in every year of that recent multi-year record, with no loss year appearing.
The system scales by building data and analytical infrastructure once and then reusing it across many clients and use cases, rather than rebuilding it for each one. CompanyGraph's reading of its recent financial pattern, rising operating income alongside a capital-heavy asset base whose depreciation has not kept pace, together with cash generation that runs high relative to both assets and equity, fits a system where income growth outpaces the new capital spending needed to produce it. CompanyGraph also classifies only a small number of other companies as running this same kind of information-and-analytics system, making this a distinctive rather than a widespread way of operating.
CompanyGraph classifies only a small number of other companies as running this same kind of data-and-analytics system under similar economics, which describes the shape as uncommon among the companies CompanyGraph tracks. This says nothing about whether a rival could build the same capability, which is not something this evidence covers.
The industry this company is classified under is generally understood, as a starting assumption, to be limited by its ability to attract, retain, and effectively deploy scarce skilled people, since expertise is what is being sold. This is a general industry-level assumption, not a measurement of this specific company: CompanyGraph does not hold a statement from the company about what actually limits its scale. CompanyGraph's own description of the company also emphasizes data assets and software platforms alongside expert staff, so whether a talent limit or some other limit tied to its data and software base is the operative one here is not something this evidence resolves.
Because its output depends on skilled people building and maintaining its data and analytical systems, this kind of business competes in the same skilled-labor markets as other analytics and advisory businesses for that talent, as a general matter of the industry it is classified in. It also gathers and analyzes financial, identity, and health-related data about individuals and supplies it to lenders, insurers, and healthcare organizations, categories of data and clients that generally sit inside data-protection and sector-specific rules governing how personal and financial information can be collected, used, and shared. CompanyGraph does not hold company-specific regulatory, legal, or trade-exposure information for this company, so none of that can be stated here.
Read from figures CompanyGraph recomputed from this company's statements and from its structural position. Written August 2026. A question with no evidence behind it is left out rather than answered.
Sign in to view price data.
Sign inWhat the company actually pays, and whether its own cash supports it.
The reported statements, read against the company's own industry.
6 interpretations currently present — each is a set of fired observations whose alignment reads as one structural pattern. Click an observation to see the numbers behind it.
Screen for these patternsHow does this company use capital?
Rising Operating Income With Low Depreciation on a Capital-Heavy Balance Sheet
Operating income rose four years, with small depreciation on a capital-heavy balance sheet.
FCF Ratios Elevated
Its free cash flow is large next to assets and equity, and more of its operating cash reaches it than in its industry.
Multi-Year FCF With Growth And Margin
Three years of positive free cash flow and rising revenue, four of rising equity, and much of its sales turns into cash.
Revenue Growing With Receivables Growing
Revenue has risen three years, and what customers owe has risen with it.
Is this company growing?
Multi-Year Revenue, Profit, And Income Growth
Revenue has risen in each of three years, gross profit in each of four, and it has made a profit in all five.
Where is this company structurally exposed?
Receivables Heavy and Growing
Money owed by customers keeps growing, and is much of its current assets.
An interpretation is present only while every observation it reads stays fired (score ≥ 70). It describes what the aligned readings show — never a verdict, never a prediction.
Shared structure with peers — never a ranking.
Structural observations derived from financial data, industry benchmarks, and supply chain position.
Peer Positioning
Financial Health
Supply Chain
Scale
Companies that share the same coordination system — how they create, deliver, or capture value.
Companies that share active interpretations — structural patterns currently present in both stocks.