CompanyGraph
Compass Group plc
CPG · United Kingdom
Runs cafeterias and kitchens for institutions like hospitals, military bases, and offshore platforms under long-term contracts that make leaving expensive.
Compass Group runs the kitchens at places like offshore oil platforms, military bases, and hospital campuses — institutions that cannot afford the legal and regulatory exposure of feeding thousands of people under their own name. When a client signs a multi-year contract, it transfers its food safety liability and health department permits to Compass, and getting those permits back means persuading a regulator to approve a transfer to a new operator — a process that takes time and is not guaranteed — so the cost of leaving falls on the client rather than on Compass. Because Compass operates across thousands of such sites, it can negotiate bulk purchasing deals with suppliers like Sysco and US Foods that no single institution could match on its own, making its food costs lower per site the larger it grows. The entire structure, though, rests on the liability-transfer clause: if regulators ever standardize and speed up permit transfers, or if clients simply decide the interim risk is worth bearing, the legal friction that holds every contract in place disappears at once across the whole portfolio.
How does this company make money?
Most contracts pay the company a fixed monthly or annual management fee. On top of that, food and labor costs are often passed directly through to the client with a predetermined markup added — so the company earns a margin on every ingredient purchased and every hour worked. Some contracts also use per-meal pricing, where the company earns a set amount for each meal served. Extra services like catering events or running vending machines bring in additional fees.
What makes this company hard to replace?
Leaving before the contract ends triggers early termination penalties. Beyond the financial penalty, the client must obtain regulatory approval to transfer health department permits to a new operator — a process that takes time and is not guaranteed to go smoothly. Any specialized kitchen equipment installed at the site must either be replaced or assumed by the incoming contractor. And the replacement contractor would need months to learn the client-specific dietary requirements and service protocols that the existing operator already knows.
What limits this company?
Every contract has a fixed end date, typically every three to five years, when the client must formally re-tender the work. At that moment, a lower-priced competitor can win the entire site in one go. There is no way to spread that risk across time — if the site is lost, the revenue from that location disappears immediately and completely.
What does this company depend on?
The company cannot operate without bulk food distributors Sysco and US Foods for ingredient supply at institutional scale. It also needs active health department permits in every jurisdiction where it runs a site, liability insurance coverage for food safety incidents across all those locations, specialized kitchen equipment suppliers for institutional-grade preparation systems, and local labor pools at each contract site.
Who depends on this company?
University students rely on it directly — if a campus contract ended, dining halls would close or meal variety would sharply drop. Offshore oil rig workers have no alternative food source at all; remote platform locations cannot support independent food services, so a contract termination would mean no meals. Corporate employees at office complexes would lose cafeteria access entirely. Hospital patients would have their nutritional care handed back to nursing staff, who are not equipped to manage it.
How does this company scale?
As the company adds more institutional sites, its total purchasing volume grows and it can negotiate bulk commodity contracts with suppliers like Sysco and US Foods that individual clients could never achieve on their own — so food costs fall per site as the network expands. What does not get easier is compliance: each new site and new regulatory jurisdiction adds its own permits, dietary protocols, and local labor management, so the operational complexity grows with every location added.
What external forces can significantly affect this company?
Immigration policy changes directly affect how many foodservice workers are available at each site, since institutional kitchens depend on local labor pools that can shrink quickly if visa or work-permit rules tighten. Currency fluctuations raise or lower food commodity costs for international operations, including UK and European contracts. Government budget cuts reduce what military bases, schools, and other public-sector clients are willing or able to spend on foodservice contracts.
Where is this company structurally vulnerable?
If health department regulators simplified or sped up the permit-transfer process — or if clients decided the temporary food safety exposure during a switch was acceptable — the legal friction holding every contract in place would vanish at the same time across the entire portfolio. The business would lose its core retention mechanism in one regulatory change.
Supply Chain
Seafood Supply Chain
The seafood supply chain is shaped by three root constraints: wild catch uncertainty where ocean fisheries are biological systems whose yields depend on weather, migration patterns, and stock health — none of which are controllable; extreme perishability where seafood degrades faster than almost any other protein and the cold chain must begin on the vessel and cannot be interrupted; and traceability gaps where seafood passes through auctions, processors, and distributors across multiple countries, making origin verification structurally difficult.
Coffee Supply Chain
The coffee supply chain moves beans, roasted coffee, and espresso from tropical farms to global consumers, shaped by three root constraints: coffee trees take years to mature and produce one harvest annually, roasted coffee degrades in weeks while green beans store for months, and production is concentrated in the tropical belt while consumption is concentrated outside it.
Beef Supply Chain
The beef supply chain is shaped by three root constraints: a biological growth cycle that delays production response by 18 to 24 months, a cold chain dependency that requires unbroken refrigeration from slaughter through retail, and processing concentration where four companies handle roughly 85% of US beef — a structure driven by the capital intensity and regulatory burden of large-scale slaughter facilities.