Cohu sells capital equipment that tests and inspects semiconductors, then draws most of its revenue from the recurring parts, software and service that installed equipment keeps needing.
- Depends onUpstream position: supplies 5 industries, depends on 2
- ScaleMarket cap is $3.17B, above the global median of $1.18B
- FinancialsAltman Z-Score 5.18: safe zone
What this company is and how it runs — written from structure, not news.
Inside its customers' own production lines, the system provides the machines that handle, test and inspect chips after they are made, plus data-analytics software that turns the results of those tests into information the manufacturer uses to run its process. It sits between chip manufacturers, the fabless companies that design chips without making them, and the contract test facilities that manufacturers use, coordinating the testing step on their behalf rather than serving an end consumer directly.
Cohu earns money two ways: selling complete test and inspection systems, booked when control of the system passes to the customer, and selling the interface products, spare parts, kits and software that go with equipment already installed, booked as they ship or as the related service is performed. The recurring stream is larger than new-system sales, and the company names its recurring-revenue model as one of its own strategic strengths.
A recomputation of its financial statements shows profitability that is not smooth: the company posted a loss in at least one recent fiscal year alongside positive results in the others tested. Cohu itself ties its system sales to the capital-investment cycles of its chip-making customers, consistent with a scale pattern that moves in swings with customer spending rather than compounding steadily.
The company relies on one outsourced manufacturing partner for most of its semiconductor test-system production, and on suppliers of certain parts that it describes as available from only one source or a limited number of sources, including components used in its test sockets where it has named supply delays without identifying the specific part or supplier. It also depends on being able to recruit specialized technical staff in locations where it says competition for that talent is intense.
A small number of large customers account for most of the company's revenue. Its buyers are chip manufacturers and the contract test houses they use, which depend on its equipment and software to test and sort chips as part of their own production process.
CompanyGraph classifies this company alongside a broad group of other companies whose economics center on converting inputs to outputs through fixed capacity that runs at a capped rate, meaning the basic shape of its operating model is widely shared rather than unusual, and the evidence available does not identify any specific capability that rival firms cannot replicate. Structurally near is not the same as moving together or being interchangeable, it means CompanyGraph sees a shared way of operating or a detected pattern, not a price relationship or a comparison verdict.
The company's own disclosures cut two ways here: unfilled orders can generally be canceled or rescheduled with little or no penalty, so a placed order by itself does not lock in a customer. Separately, it describes the process by which customers select and accept new equipment as lengthy, which points toward switching friction sitting in that qualification process rather than in contract terms, though the company does not address switching directly.
In its own account, the company points to several forces that limit its growth: how quickly it can turn technical change into products customers accept, how long each customer takes to select and qualify new equipment, its ability to secure critical parts when suppliers are constrained, export restrictions on what it can sell and where, and its ability to recruit specialized engineering talent in the small number of places where that talent is concentrated. It describes its business as shaped by both the investment cycles of its chip-making customers and, at times, constraints on its own supply of critical components.
The company itself names rapid technological change and the risk of failing to transition products in time, alongside the broader cyclicality of the semiconductor industry, as the risks it lists first. It also flags concentration in a small number of large customers, reliance on one outsourced manufacturing partner and on suppliers with only one or a few sources for certain parts, and a manufacturing and sales footprint concentrated in Asia, as vulnerabilities in its own disclosures.
The business sits inside a semiconductor-equipment industry that it describes as cyclical, seasonal and prone to sudden shifts in customer investment. It is also exposed to trade and export-control policy between the United States and China, which can restrict what it manufactures or sells to customers there, and it carries currency exposure across the several countries where it manufactures and sells, alongside routine tax examinations in more than one jurisdiction.
Read from the company's own filings and public materials (gathered August 2026) together with figures CompanyGraph recomputed from its statements. Written September 2026. A question with no evidence behind it is left out rather than answered.
Sign in to view price data.
Sign inThe reported statements, read against the company's own industry.
Shared structure with peers — never a ranking.
Structural observations derived from financial data, industry benchmarks, and supply chain position.
Structural Tensions
Financial Health
Supply Chain
Scale
Companies that share the same coordination system — how they create, deliver, or capture value.