Alignment Healthcare (ALHC)

Alignment Healthcare (ALHC) | CompanyGraph

Alignment Healthcare enrolls Medicare-eligible seniors across Arizona, California, Nevada, North Carolina, and Texas, then uses its AVA® AI platform to track each member's health in real time, intervene before conditions worsen, and document those conditions in the form CMS requires to pay the plan more per member each month. Because the same intervention data that drives higher risk adjustment scores also feeds the quality metrics CMS uses to calculate star ratings, a single clinical workflow simultaneously determines both the per-member payment level and whether the plan keeps the 4-star multiplier that lets it recruit new members during annual enrollment. As more members enroll, AVA® accumulates more individual health history, which sharpens its predictions without proportionally raising costs — but that history is tied to each member's enrollment under CMS rules and cannot transfer to a competitor, so a rival starting fresh would spend years rebuilding what Alignment already has. The whole structure depends on CMS continuing to reward documented health complexity the way it does today: if the agency narrows which diagnoses qualify for risk adjustment or recalibrates how it scores them, the revenue premium that pays for AVA® would shrink at the same moment the platform's fixed costs do not.

How does this company make money?

CMS pays the company a fixed amount every month for each enrolled member. That base payment is adjusted upward based on how complex and sick the member's documented health conditions are — the higher the risk adjustment score AVA® generates, the more the company is paid for that person. When the plan achieves a 4-star or 5-star quality rating, CMS adds bonus payments on top of the regular monthly amounts. More enrolled members, sicker documented members, and higher star ratings all directly increase revenue.

What makes this company hard to replace?

Members can only change Medicare Advantage plans during specific annual enrollment windows, so switching is not possible at any other time of year. The health history that AVA® has built up for each individual member is tied to that member's enrollment under CMS rules and cannot move to a new carrier, meaning any plan they switch to starts without that personalized data. The clinical protocols AVA® develops for each member also require months of history to work well, so a member who left would lose that optimized care and the new plan would take a long time to rebuild it.

What limits this company?

CMS scores risk adjustment and star ratings once a year, so if AVA® misses a diagnosis or makes a coding error, that mistake lowers the payment rate for the entire plan year with no chance to fix it mid-year. On top of that, new members can only join during annual enrollment windows. If the star rating drops below 4, those windows close — so the company loses the ability to add members at exactly the moment it is already earning less per existing member.

What does this company depend on?

The company cannot operate without CMS Medicare Advantage capitation payments, which are the source of nearly all its revenue. It relies entirely on the AVA® AI platform to generate the clinical documentation and quality metrics those payments depend on. State insurance department licenses in Arizona, California, Nevada, North Carolina, and Texas are required to enroll members in each market. Provider network contracts with local hospitals and physicians are needed to actually deliver care. And CMS risk adjustment data submission systems must function correctly for the company's health complexity coding to be accepted and paid.

Who depends on this company?

Enrolled Medicare-eligible seniors who use the company's plans would lose their specialized chronic care coordination if AVA® stopped working and would revert to standard Medicare coverage. Provider partners like Intermountain Health, whose members are enrolled through co-branded plans, would also see those members fall back to standard coverage. CMS itself relies on growing private Medicare Advantage enrollment to reduce what the federal government spends delivering Medicare directly, so a contraction in plans like this one pushes costs back toward the federal budget.

How does this company scale?

As more members enroll, AVA®'s algorithms accumulate more health history, which improves prediction accuracy — so the core technology gets more valuable as it grows, without a proportional rise in cost. What does not scale easily is the provider network. Building relationships with hospitals and physicians in each state takes years and requires regulatory approvals that cannot be accelerated with money alone, so geographic expansion into new states is slow by nature.

What external forces can significantly affect this company?

The biggest external threat is a CMS decision to restructure the Medicare Advantage payment methodology — changing which diagnoses qualify for risk adjustment or tightening the criteria for star ratings would directly cut revenue. Federal budget pressure on Medicare spending could reduce capitation rates across the board or raise the bar for bonus payments. On the other side, the aging baby boomer generation is expanding the pool of Medicare-eligible seniors faster than providers in the target states can grow, which creates both opportunity and strain on the provider networks the company depends on.

Where is this company structurally vulnerable?

CMS has the authority to change which diagnoses count toward risk adjustment scores or to recalibrate how much documented complexity is worth in dollars. If CMS narrowed those rules, the documented diagnoses that AVA® produces would translate into smaller — or no — payment increases, breaking the direct link between clinical interventions and higher revenue and making the cost of running the platform impossible to justify.

Alignment Healthcare, Inc.

Peer Positioning

Structural Tensions

Financial Health

Supply Chain

Scale