Operates physical data centers in China and earns by selling access to that capacity, directly to businesses and as local infrastructure that larger cloud platforms use to reach them.
- Depends onMidstream position: 6 outgoing, 9 incoming connections
- ScaleMarket cap is $3.27B, above the global median of $1.18B
- FinancialsAltman Z-Score 2.18: grey zone
What this company is and how it runs — written from structure, not news.
It takes in physical capacity, land, construction, power and computing hardware, and turns that into data-center and network access that both direct business customers and at least one larger cloud platform rely on to reach users locally. It sits closer to the input side of its surrounding network of business relationships than the output side, drawing on more upstream connections than it feeds downstream.
Money comes from operating physical data-center space and network connectivity as the base layer, then selling additional services, cloud computing, consulting, hosting and intelligent-computing offerings, built on top of that same underlying infrastructure, according to the company's own description of its business.
It scales by adding physical capacity, land, construction and hardware, rather than by simply replicating a software product, which tends to make growth lumpier and more capital-intensive than for a purely digital business. CompanyGraph currently maps very few other companies to this same way of operating and the same underlying economics, so it sits in a narrow group rather than a crowded field of directly comparable peers.
By its own account, it depends on a foreign technology partner's authorization to operate at least one of its cloud offerings, on holding a set of government-issued telecommunications and data-center licenses to operate at all, and on access to capital, land and construction capacity to build and run its facilities.
By the company's own account, a global cloud platform and the businesses and developers using that platform's China service depend on it to build and run the local infrastructure the platform needs there; the platform's own tools and interfaces sit on top of infrastructure this company supplies and operates.
CompanyGraph places this company among a very small group of companies that operate the same way under the same underlying economics, rather than in a crowded field of directly comparable peers. Structurally near is not the same as moving together or being interchangeable, it means CompanyGraph sees a shared way of operating or a detected pattern, not a price relationship or a comparison verdict.
By its own account, this company's operations run on data-center facilities, computing hardware, capital, land and construction capacity, and it names ownership of its data-center property among its own strengths. These same inputs, physical space, power, construction capacity and capital, are what would need to keep expanding for it to grow further, based on CompanyGraph's reading of how this kind of business works rather than a limit the company states outright. Separately, the broader industry category CompanyGraph places it in is normally bound by access to scarce specialised talent, but the company's own stated strengths do not emphasize talent, so that industry-level pattern does not clearly apply to what this company itself describes.
In the years of financial statements CompanyGraph holds for this company, net income has turned negative more than once, meaning revenue and other income did not cover its total costs in those periods. CompanyGraph does not hold a customer-concentration, single-source-supplier or named risk disclosure for this company, so it cannot say what specifically would cause that to recur, only that it has happened before within the period on file.
It operates under a set of government-issued telecommunications and data-center licenses and quality and security certifications that are named preconditions for running its business, and by its own account, at least one of its cloud offerings runs under an authorization granted by a foreign technology partner. Both create ongoing external dependencies, on regulators to maintain its standing and on a partner relationship to keep offering that product, that sit outside the company's own control.
Read from the company's own filings and public materials (gathered August 2026) together with figures CompanyGraph recomputed from its statements. Written September 2026. A question with no evidence behind it is left out rather than answered.
Sign in to view price data.
Sign inWhat the company actually pays, and whether its own cash supports it.
The reported statements, read against the company's own industry.
Shared structure with peers — never a ranking.
Structural observations derived from financial data, industry benchmarks, and supply chain position.
Financial Health
Supply Chain
Scale
Companies that share the same coordination system — how they create, deliver, or capture value.