China Cinda Asset Management Co. Ltd.
1359 · HKEX · China
Price data from its 0CI listing on XSTU, quoted in EUR
cinda.com.cnFinancials as of FY2025
A state-controlled group that buys distressed debt from banks, then earns by restructuring, recovering or reselling it, while a parallel financial-services arm adds banking, securities and leasing income.
- Depends onMidstream position: 5 outgoing, 5 incoming connections
- ScaleMarket cap is $6.52B, above the global median of $1.18B
- PositionDebt-to-equity is 4.52×, higher than 95% of its Asset Management peers (median 0.51×)
- Interpretations1 currently firing — 1
What this company is and how it runs — written from structure, not news.
The system sits between banks and other financial institutions that need to move bad debt off their books and the distressed borrowers or enterprises behind that debt, taking on the credit risk of those claims directly and coordinating their resolution through restructuring, debt-for-equity conversion or disposal. A separate banking, securities, trust and leasing arm runs alongside this core function. CompanyGraph's map of how it connects to others shows a roughly balanced position, with about as many relationships feeding it assets as there are on the side it resolves or sells into.
It earns income two ways: gains, interest and fair-value movements on the distressed debt and equity it holds as it restructures, recovers or sells it, and fees, commissions and interest from a separate banking, securities, trust and leasing business. The two sources contribute broadly comparable shares of total income, so neither alone determines the result.
Growing the business means carrying a larger balance sheet, whether more distressed debt and equity or a larger banking, securities and leasing book, and that balance sheet is funded mainly through borrowings, bonds and customer-held amounts rather than equity, so its debt tends to grow alongside the assets it holds. CompanyGraph's reading of the capital structure shows debt elevated relative to equity, total assets and operating cash flow all at once, consistent with a model that leans on borrowed money to fund its scale. Its earnings have stayed positive across every year in the multi-year record CompanyGraph holds, even though a meaningful part of its income is marked to market rather than fixed.
Its core input is distressed debt and equity that banks and other financial institutions choose to sell or assign to it, plus a smaller stream of distressed receivables, bonds and loans from non-financial entities, so its acquisition volume depends on how much of this supply those institutions choose to originate and offer. Its own operations are funded mostly by borrowings, amounts held for customers and bonds issued into wholesale credit markets rather than equity, so it also depends on continued access to those funding sources. It operates under a financial-services license and minimum capital requirements set by its national regulator.
Banks and other financial institutions that need to move non-performing loans and other distressed debt off their books depend on it as a counterparty willing to acquire that debt. Distressed enterprises and their creditors depend on it for restructuring, debt-for-equity conversion or other resolution once normal repayment is not working. A separate base of corporate and personal banking customers and margin-financing clients depends on the banking and securities businesses it runs alongside this core function.
CompanyGraph's map of similarly structured firms places this business within a sizable peer group running the same kind of expertise-driven, risk-intermediation system, not in a small or unusual category on its own. Within that group, its own account points to one distinguishing structural feature: majority ownership and control by a state investment holding company, alongside a self-described financial-relief and counter-cyclical role tied to that position. Whether other firms could replicate that role is not something CompanyGraph can assess from what is on file.
The industry classification behind this profile treats scarce, specialised expertise as the binding limit for firms of this kind, a prior CompanyGraph has not independently confirmed for this company. What its own account shows instead is a regulator-set minimum capital requirement and a funding base drawn heavily from borrowings, customer-held amounts and bonds rather than equity, so continued access to capital and wholesale funding, within the ceiling its regulator sets, looks like the more directly evidenced limit on how large a book of distressed assets it can carry.
The company's own risk disclosures name credit risk, market risk and liquidity risk, including interest-rate and currency risk, as what it watches most closely, centering the exposure on the recoverable value of the distressed debt and equity it holds and on its ability to keep rolling over the borrowed funding behind it. A large share of that exposure sits outside mainland China, including Hong Kong, with a further concentration in corporate real estate, so conditions in either area weigh disproportionately on the portfolio, and CompanyGraph separately reads the balance sheet as leaning on debt relative to equity, assets and operating cash flow at the same time. Pending legal claims against it as a defendant are also large enough, relative to recent annual profit, to matter if they resolve unfavourably.
It operates under a national financial regulator that issues its operating license and sets minimum capital requirements, plus stock-exchange listing rules, so regulatory capital and disclosure requirements are a standing pressure on how it is run. It also discloses active legal claims against it as a defendant, a further pressure alongside its regulatory obligations. A meaningful share of its book sits outside mainland China, including Hong Kong, and it holds foreign-currency exposure alongside its mostly domestic-currency business, so conditions and currency movements outside its home market also weigh on it.
Read from the company's own filings and public materials (gathered August 2026) together with figures CompanyGraph recomputed from its statements. Written August 2026. A question with no evidence behind it is left out rather than answered.
Sign in to view price data.
Sign inWhat the company actually pays, and whether its own cash supports it.
The reported statements, read against the company's own industry.
1 interpretation currently present — each is a set of fired observations whose alignment reads as one structural pattern. Click an observation to see the numbers behind it.
Screen for these patternsWhere is this company structurally exposed?
Elevated Leverage on Three Denominators
Debt sits high against its equity, its assets, and its cash flow.
An interpretation is present only while every observation it reads stays fired (score ≥ 70). It describes what the aligned readings show — never a verdict, never a prediction.
Shared structure with peers — never a ranking.
Structural observations derived from financial data, industry benchmarks, and supply chain position.
Peer Positioning
Structural Tensions
Supply Chain
Scale
Companies that share the same coordination system — how they create, deliver, or capture value.
Companies that share active interpretations — structural patterns currently present in both stocks.