Compressed Volatility

Compressed Volatility

Stock Screener Filter

Use to find companies where this pattern is active.

StabilityMarketStructureStory type: Diagnostic

Price behavior looks calm, but volatility indicators suggest otherwise. One-year volatility is low while both Bollinger squeeze and Keltner squeeze indicators are present. The apparent stability may be compression before expansion.

State

Apparent stability with structural volatility compression

Emergence

Price appears stable but volatility compression suggests energy building. When one-year volatility is low but both Bollinger and Keltner squeeze indicators are present, the apparent stability may be coiled energy rather than genuine calm. Low volatility periods often precede expansion, not continued stability.

Limits

This story identifies structural discrepancy, not volatility expansion prediction. It does not claim a breakout is imminent, predict direction of any expansion, or indicate timing. Volatility squeezes can persist before resolving.

Screen for Compressed Volatility

Find stocks where this pattern is currently active in the screener.

Compressed Volatility
inverse vol 1y
bollinger squeeze standard
keltner squeeze
Open in Screener

Explanation

This diagnostic clarifies a common misreading: Surface reading: Low volatility suggests a stable, predictable stock with manageable risk. Structural reality: Low Volatility (1Y) is high—the stock has exhibited low price movement over the past year, appearing calm. However, Bollinger Squeeze indicates Bollinger Bands have compressed inside Keltner Channels, and Keltner Squeeze confirms the compression pattern from a second framework. The combination reveals that apparent stability may be a transitional state rather than a permanent characteristic. Volatility tends to mean-revert; compression often precedes expansion.

Interpretation

This story identifies structural discrepancy between stability appearance and compression reality. It does not predict expansion timing, direction, or magnitude. It clarifies that low volatility is not necessarily stable volatility.